Looking for Linear Motor Exercises

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the request for exercises involving linear motors, as the original poster finds none in their physics book. Key concepts mentioned include Lenz's Law and Maxwell's equations, which are relevant to the topic. Participants inquire about the specific physics book being referenced to provide tailored assistance. The conversation highlights the need for practical exercises to better understand linear motors in physics. Overall, the thread seeks to bridge the gap in educational resources for linear motor applications.
paulcaimp
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement:: Hi, I'm looking for an exercise involving a linear motor, but on my physics book there are none
Relevant Equations:: Lenz Law, Maxwell's equation

Hi, everyone I'm looking for an exercise involving a linear motor, but on my physics book there are none. Do you happen to have one?

[Moderator's note: moved from a homework forum.]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What physics book are you looking at?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top