Looking for the name of a class of ODE:

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monochrome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying the class of the given ordinary differential equation (ODE) represented by the expression M(x,y)y' + N(x,y) = 0. The equation is classified as an exact equation, as it can be expressed in terms of a potential function φ(x,y) where ∂φ/∂x = N(x,y) and ∂φ/∂y = M(x,y). The general solution to this exact differential equation is φ(x,y) = 0, which corresponds to a conservative force field in physics. The participants clarify typographical errors and reinforce the understanding of partial derivatives in the context of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with exact differential equations
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and the chain rule
  • Basic concepts of conservative force fields in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exact differential equations
  • Learn about potential functions in the context of physics
  • Explore the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Research the relationship between conservative force fields and potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with ordinary differential equations and their applications in modeling conservative systems.

Monochrome
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



M(x,y)y^{'}(x) + N(x,y) = 0
There exists:
\phi(x,y)
Such that
\frac{\partial\phi(x,y)}{\partial x}=N(x,y)

\frac{\partial\phi(x,y)}{\partial y}=M(x,y)

I'm not looking for a solution to anything particular to this but I can't find the type in my notes and I can't google it unless I know the name.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is an exact equation since
d\phi= M(x,y)dy+ NIx,y)dx[/itex]<br /> is an exact differential.<br /> <br /> Of course, since the differential equation says d\phi= 0, \phi(x,y)= 0 is the general solution.
 
By the way, in physics, such a differential would correspond to a "conservative force field" and the function \phi would be the "potential function".
 
Thanks.
Just a question: The I after the N is a typo yes? And how did you get d\phi= 0?
 
Last edited:
Yex, that was a typo- my finger was aiming at "("!

Since \phi is a function of both x and y, d\phi /dx would make no sense. By the chain rule, if x and y are functions of some third variable, t,
\frac{d\phi}{dt}= \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}\frac{dx}{dt}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}\frac{dy}{dt}
or, in differential notation,
d\phi= \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}dx+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}dy
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yex, that was a typo-

:smile:

Thanks I forgot that this was dealing with partials. It makes sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K