Lorentz transformation and Lorentz force

Click For Summary
The Lorentz transformation relates the electromagnetic fields, with the equation E' = γ(E + v × B) illustrating how electric and magnetic fields transform between frames. The Lorentz force per unit charge is expressed as F = E + v × B, without the γ factor, since it does not involve a change of frame. Transforming force between different systems reveals that while F_x' remains unchanged, F_y' and F_z' acquire a γ factor. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using four-vector notation to avoid confusion regarding transformations. Overall, the Lorentz force formula is confirmed to hold true across different reference frames when electromagnetic fields are appropriately transformed.
sweet springs
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
75
Lorentz transformation of electromagnetic field gives the relation ##E'=\gamma(E+v\times B)##.
Lorentz force per unit charge is given as ##F=E+v\times B## without ##\gamma##.
Don't we need coefficient ##\gamma## for F?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Why would you? There's no change of frame involved in the force expression. F' will include a ##\gamma## somewhere, which you can get either from transforming the force or from transforming E, B, and v.
 
Thanks. If I am right the transformation of force from a system S where a particle is moving at v_x to any system S' which is moving relative to system S at a speed -v_x, so the particle is at rest there.

F_x'=F_x,\ F_y'=\gamma F_y,\ F_z'=\gamma F_z

In transforming force from S' ( where only E works ) to S, I am not sure how to deal with gamma in three directions.

P.S. Now I know that E and B also has inhomogeneity in directions and cancel out coefficient gamma. I am happy to confirm that Lorentz force formula holds strictly. Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
I would urge you to start using four-vector notation. These questions do not arise there. I think what you are missing is that momentum here is 'relativistic', i.e. ##\vec{Force}=d\vec{p}/dt## where ##\vec{p}=\gamma {m} \dot{\vec{r}}##

Assuimng that vector potential is static one can write the equation of motion for a charged point particle (directly from least action):

##\frac{dp_\alpha}{d\tau}=-qu^{\mu}F_{\mu\alpha}##

Where ##p_\alpha## is the covariant four-momentum, ##\tau## is proper time, ##u^\mu## is four-velocity and ##F_{\mu\alpha}## is the electromagnetic tensor, and ##q## is charge. Now we go into 3-dimensions and focus on spatial components:

##d\tau \to dt/\gamma##
##p_{\alpha=1,2,3} \to -\vec{p}##
##u^{\mu} \to \gamma \left(c, \dot{\vec{r}}\right)^\mu ##
##F_{0i} \to \vec{E}/c##
##F_{ij} \to -\epsilon_{ijk}\left(\vec{B}\right)^k##

You thus get

##\frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}=q\left(\vec{E}+\dot{\vec{r}}\times\vec{B}\right)##

Since, by definition ##p_{\alpha}=m u_\alpha=m\gamma\left(c,\dot{\vec{r}}\right)_\alpha=(\dots,\vec{p})_\alpha##, we have ##\vec{p}=\gamma {m} \dot{\vec{r}}##
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and sweet springs
I should probably clarify. What analysis above tells you is that the equation above is valid in any reference frame, and that when moving between reference frames the electromagnetic fields should be changed using standard Lorentz transforms, to get ##d\vec{p}/dt## which by definition is the force on the object.
 
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
682
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K