Lorentz Transformation: Proving θμ Covariant Vector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the derivative θμ transforms as a contravariant vector, given that it is established as a covariant vector. Participants suggest using analogous proofs from covariant transformations to demonstrate this relationship. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the transformation properties of derivatives in the context of Lorentz transformations. Key terms include covariant and contravariant vectors, which are essential in the study of tensor calculus and relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant and contravariant vectors
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Basic knowledge of tensor calculus
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of covariant and contravariant vectors in detail
  • Learn about the mathematical framework of Lorentz transformations
  • Explore tensor calculus applications in physics
  • Review proofs related to vector transformations in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying relativity and tensor calculus, as well as educators looking to clarify the transformation properties of vectors in advanced mathematics.

helpcometk
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that the derivative θμ transforms as a covariant vector ,show that θμ transforms as a contravariant vector.

Homework Equations



Please look the attachement

The Attempt at a Solution


Does anyone know how i should go to prove it ?Is it just a trivial substitution ?
 

Attachments

  • wder.PNG
    wder.PNG
    17.9 KB · Views: 580
Physics news on Phys.org
helpcometk said:

Homework Statement



Given that the derivative θμ transforms as a covariant vector ,show that θμ transforms as a contravariant vector.

Homework Equations



Please look the attachement

The Attempt at a Solution


Does anyone know how i should go to prove it ?Is it just a trivial substitution ?

What are θμ & θμ supposed to mean exactly? Uf the problem is just to show that \frac{\partial}{\partial x_\mu} transforms as a contravariant vector, just try an analogous proof to the covariant case in your image. If you get stuck, show your work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K