Low GPA, Some Experience & Guidance?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a junior year Physics major expressing concerns about their low GPA of 2.87 and the implications for graduate school admission, particularly in fields related to space science. Participants provide insights and advice on academic performance, career aspirations, and the broader educational system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that a GPA of 2.87 may not meet the typical requirement of 3.0 for graduate school in physics, suggesting that many successful applicants have higher GPAs.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding personal aptitudes and the job market, advocating for a more structured educational system that provides better guidance for students.
  • Some participants suggest that the original poster consider reducing extracurricular commitments to focus more on academic performance.
  • There are discussions about the potential benefits of taking easier courses to improve GPA, though one participant warns that this strategy can backfire if the courses are unexpectedly challenging.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of clarity regarding future job opportunities in the field of study, with suggestions for exploring a wider range of career options.
  • One participant encourages the original poster to reflect on their intrinsic motivation and the importance of finding value in their contributions, rather than relying solely on external validation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the implications of GPA for graduate school admission. While there is a consensus that a GPA below 3.0 is generally problematic, opinions vary on the importance of extracurricular activities and the strategies for improving academic performance.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of balancing academic responsibilities with extracurricular activities, as well as the uncertainty surrounding job prospects in various fields. There is also mention of the educational system's role in adequately preparing students for their future careers.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for undergraduate students in STEM fields who are concerned about their academic performance and future career opportunities, as well as those seeking advice on balancing studies with extracurricular commitments.

  • #31
Not naming names but there was a school in southern California which had a program for Master's degree in Physics as that departments highest level degree. No information about "tier".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Vanadium 50 said:
But is DePaul a "lower tier" school that will "that will take just about any grad student with over a 3.0"?

That, I do not know.

Zz.
 
  • #33
There are plenty (56 on the AIP list) of schools that have a MS as their highest degree. I'm not doubting that. It's the "lower tier" school that will "that will take just about any grad student with over a 3.0" where I would like to see an example. As I said, "I know a place that will take you but I'm not going to say where" is not so helpful.
 
  • #34
I would imagine giving names is not always appropriate.
 
  • #35
astrogato96 said:
Hey all,

So I just joined this forum, thinking it might be a good source of advice for something.

I'm a Junior year Physics major at a decent state university school, and I have a GPA of 2.87. I had a few internships in High School and a summer/part time coding job for some planetary geologists at Goddard mostly streaming their processing workflows with basic to intermediate scripting and programming, where my mentors emphatically like my work.

I also volunteer to run a major space industry gala annually where I've met folks like Buzz Aldrin, a US Senator, and the likes, and run the campus Astro Club. I'm also a Resident Assistant and am well liked there, and have saxophoned for NFL team marching bands and developed a quirky hobby of learning languages.

I am fairly concerned about getting into Grad school. Since I'm paying for my tuition I'm taking a guilt free 5th year to crank up my GPA, but constantly struggle to understand and perform well in my Physics and Math classes after hours of pain sometimes, and in particular am worrying about getting a first F somewhere this semester despite using office hours and the like.

I breezed through Chemistry and don't really think I'm a hardcore math robot anymore, but can't switch out of Physics and still graduate in 5 years or less. I'm thinking of getting into planetary, geology, or atmospheric, but there is no department or any knowledge of the former 2 at my university, and don't know if they like my GPA or experience. Or maybe I'm wanting to close the Physics door too early?

Any guidance on either surviving both a Physics undergrad and getting into grad school in some of the areas I mentioned earlier? At this point, I'm really craving for my full time place to be one that values me and I value back as much as my original goal to be in space science.

Help.
What is your major GPA?

I was in a situation where I slacked off my freshmen year. As a result my major gpa was MUCH higher than my actual gpa. Also is there a trend when you look at your gpa per semester or per year that you can show?

take the below example.

student A: 3.0 gpa all 4 years
student B: 2.5 gpa first 2 years, 3.5 gpa final 2 years

I would take student B almost every time, even though they both graduate with a 3.0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K