M6.6 - 39km WSW of Ashkasham, Afghanistan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses a recent earthquake event near Ashkasham, Afghanistan, focusing on its characteristics, tectonic implications, and effects felt in neighboring regions. The scope includes geological analysis, seismic activity, and the impact on surrounding areas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention the earthquake's depth of 210.4 km, noting that it lacked significant surface wave activity due to this depth.
  • One participant reports that the earthquake was felt strongly in Pakistan, citing a news article that mentions casualties and injuries.
  • There is a discussion about the earthquake's mechanism, with one participant suggesting it has an oblique thrust mechanism, which aligns with the tectonic features of the NE Afghanistan/NW Pakistan region.
  • Some models are presented regarding the tectonic activity in the region, including the possibility of two subduction zones or a single contorted slab, but no consensus is reached on which model is correct.
  • A participant reflects on their past experience with focal mechanisms and expresses a desire to update their knowledge on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the tectonic mechanisms involved and the implications of the earthquake's depth, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the specific tectonic models and the implications of the earthquake's depth on its surface effects. The discussion includes references to external sources for further context.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,581
Reaction score
7,536
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith and davenn
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
Did you detect that one Dave?

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20005gsg#general
2016-04-10 10:28:58 (UTC)
Location: Lat 36.492°N, Long 71.156°E
Depth: 210.4 km (130.7 mi) - moderately deep

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/tectonic/images/himalaya_tsum.pdf

I notice some smaller quakes up that way, perhaps a few weeks ago.
Yes I did, but being quite deep, it lacked the good surface wave activity

M6.6 NE Afghanistan zhi.gif
cheers
Dave
 
Apparently it was felt strongly in Pakistan.

Earthquake rattles Pakistan, 1 dead, 30 wounded
https://www.yahoo.com/news/earthquake-rattles-pakistans-capital-other-cities-110611019.html
Pakistani official Arif Ullah told The Associated Press that the magnitude-7.1 quake was centered near neighboring Afghanistan's border with Tajikistan. Germany's GFZ Research Center for Geosciences set the quake's magnitude at 6.5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
appears to have an oblique thrust mechanism
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20005gsg#moment-tensor

which gels with the tectonics of the NE Afghanistan/NW Pakistan region

USGS
On the north-western side of the Tibetan Plateau, beneath the Pamir-Hindu Kush Mountains of northern Afghanistan, earthquakes occur at depths as great as 200 km as a result of remnant lithospheric subduction. The curved arc of deep earthquakes found in the Hindu Kush Pamir region indicates the presence of a lithospheric body at depth, thought to be remnants of a subducting slab. Cross-sections through the Hindu Kush region suggest a near vertical northerly-dipping subducting slab, whereas cross-sections through the nearby Pamir region to the east indicate a much shallower dipping, southerly subducting slab. Some models suggest the presence of two subduction zones; with the Indian plate being subducted beneath the Hindu Kush region and the Eurasian plate being subducted beneath the Pamir region. However, other models suggest that just one of the two plates is being subducted and that the slab has become contorted and overturned in places
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20005gsg#general

I used to be so good at working out fomec's ( beachballs). have got a little rusty over recent years

Many years ago I did do a focal mec. basics page on my www site
http://www.sydneystormcity.com/fomec.htm

I should do some updating ... too many things to do and so little time :rolleyes:Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K