Maclaurin Series, expressing 2^x as a M series.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves expressing the function 2^x as a Maclaurin Series. The original poster attempts to derive this series by examining derivatives and considering logarithmic transformations, but encounters challenges in visualizing the series representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss taking derivatives of the exponential function and explore the use of logarithmic properties to simplify the expression. There is mention of a common technique involving the natural logarithm to facilitate the series expansion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into alternative methods for approaching the problem, including a suggestion to rewrite the function using properties of exponents. The discussion reflects a collaborative exploration of different strategies without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses difficulty in visualizing the series and is seeking hints, indicating a potential gap in understanding the transformation from the logarithmic form to the series representation.

Disowned
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Okay I was given this problem as a challenge question. It simply says expressing 2x power as a Maclaurin Series. At first, following an example given by my instructor, I thought that by examining the function as I took multiple derivatives I could find a pattern.

By as you can imagine taking multiple derivatives of an exponential function is anything but pretty. So instead I thought to express the function as a logarithm and set 2x = n, from there I could rewrite it as Log2 n = x. But I'm having trouble visualizing that as a sum at 0 to infinity. Anyone got any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, taking higher derivatives of a^x isn't all that awful... but there is a short cut.

Write 2 as [tex]e^{ln 2}[/tex]. Then our function becomes

[tex]y = 2^x = (e^{ln 2})^x = e^{(ln 2) \cdot x}[/tex]

using properties of exponents. (This is a fairly standard "trick".)

Now call u = (ln 2) · x and use it in the Maclaurin series for [tex]e^u[/tex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weezy
THAT. IS. BRILLIANT! Thank you, I can use this info.
 
Yes... yes, it is rather... not that I invented the idea...

The same trick is used to obtain the rule for differentiating exponential functions:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} a^x = \frac{d}{dx} (e^{ln a})^x = \frac{d}{dx} e^{(ln a) \cdot x}<br /> = (ln a) \cdot e^{(ln a) \cdot x}[/tex] [by the Chain Rule]

[tex]= (ln a) \cdot a^x[/tex]

(a useful differentiation rule to remember; you can see immediately that it gives [tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x = e^x[/tex] as expected)

So, by extension, we have for f(x) = a^x ,

[tex]\frac{d^n}{dx^n} a^x = (ln a)^n \cdot a^x[/tex]

which would also give you the Maclaurin series you were after.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weezy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K