Magnetic energy of a conductor with a hole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic energy of a cylindrical conductor with a hole, where a current \( i \) is uniformly distributed. The magnetic energy is derived using the equation \( U_{m}=\int_{Volume} \frac{B^2}{2 \mu_0} dV \). The user challenges the textbook's approach, which suggests summing the energies from two equivalent currents \( i_{+} \) and \( i_{-} \), arguing that the superposition principle applies to magnetic fields but not to energy calculations. The user proposes a method to calculate the total magnetic field first before determining the magnetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and energy in conductors
  • Familiarity with the superposition principle in electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of integral calculus for evaluating volume integrals
  • Basic concepts of cylindrical coordinates in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of magnetic energy in cylindrical conductors
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electromagnetism
  • Explore the calculation of magnetic fields in complex geometries
  • Investigate the implications of energy conservation in electromagnetic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in advanced studies of magnetic fields and energy calculations in conductors.

crick
Messages
39
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A cylindrical conductor of radius ##a## has a hole of radius ##b## and there is a current ##i## uniformly spread inside the conductor.
fggggggg.jpg

Calculate the magnetic energy of the conductor.

Homework Equations


$$U_{m}=\int_{Volume} \frac{B^2}{2 \mu_0} dV$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that this system is equivalent to a integer cylindrical conductor with uniformly spread current ##i_{+}##, plus another conductor in the place of the hole, with uniformly spread current ##i_{-}##, where

$$i_{+}=\frac{i \, \pi a^2}{\pi (a^2-b^2)} \,\,\,\, \mathrm{and} \,\,\,\, i_{-}\frac{i \, \pi b^2}{\pi (a^2-b^2)}$$

I see that on my textbook this exercise is solved by saying that the total energy would be the sum of the energy due to ##i_{+}## and the energy due to ##i_{-}##, that is (doing the integral above):

$$U_{m}=\frac{\mu_0}{16 \pi} (i_{+}^2-i_{-}^2)$$

But I do not agree with that. The superposition principle is valid in the calculation of the magnetic field but not in the calculation of the total energy.

Roughly said, the sum of squares is not the square of the sum, so shouldn't I instead firstly calculate the total magnetic field il all the conductor (summing vectorially the magnetic field due to ##i_{+}## and the one due to ##i_{-}## in every point) and then calculate

$$U_{m}=\int \int \int_{Volume} \frac{B_{total}(x,y,z)^2}{2 \mu_0} dx dy dz$$

?

This process looks more correct because the superposition principle is allowed while calculating fields.

Did I get this right is the process done on my textbook valid to calculate the total energy?
 

Attachments

  • fggggggg.jpg
    fggggggg.jpg
    2.5 KB · Views: 467
  • gggggggggggggggg.gif
    gggggggggggggggg.gif
    11 KB · Views: 559
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you get a different answer?

If two systems are physically equivalent, then they will follow equivalent rules.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
761
Replies
3
Views
662
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
928
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K