I Magnetic Field Intensity At the Inductor's Air Gap (+Fringing Flux)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of an air gap in a transformer's core on magnetic field intensity and core saturation in switching power supply design. The participant shares their derivation and references a paper by Roshen, noting a discrepancy in the scalar potential function related to the air gap term. They question why Roshen's equation lacks a variable present in their own derivation, suggesting it may be a typo. Additionally, there are inquiries about the clarity of their expansion and a lack of expertise in LaPlace expansions. The conversation highlights the complexities of magnetic field calculations in transformer design.
BlackMelon
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
Hi there!

Sorry for the unclear images in the previous post. This time I upload pdf files for my derivation and the reference paper.

So, when I design a switching power supply, usually I make an air gap at the transformer's core. This will alter the BH curve, preventing the core saturation. However, as I increase the gap's length, the fluxes fringes. So, the reluctance of the air gap is not high enough to alter the BH curve as I expected.

To solve the problem, I read a paper by Roshen (file Roshen2007.pdf) and derive formulae inside that paper (file Formulae Derivation... .pdf).
I got a mismatch of scalar potential function (equation II.6 in both files).

On the last page of my derivation, I got a term Hg*y/2.
On the second page of Roshen's paper, this term is Hg/lg

I would like to know why Roshen did not put the variable y on that term?

Best Regards,
BlackMelon
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like a typo in Roshen, but I couldn't follow the expansion completely.
 
Charles Link said:
Looks to me like a typo in Roshen, but I couldn't follow the expansion completely.

May I know which part of my expansion is confusing?
 
BlackMelon said:
May I know which part of my expansion is confusing?
I don't have much expertise at doing the LaPlace expansions, both the integer one, and the continuous one. I'm somewhat familiar with the Legendre type method of solution, and I think this one is similar to that, but I have little expertise with it.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top