Undergrad Magnetic Field Intensity At the Inductor's Air Gap (+Fringing Flux)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the design of switching power supplies, specifically addressing the impact of air gaps in transformer cores on magnetic field intensity and core saturation. The user, BlackMelon, references a paper by Roshen (2007) to derive formulae related to the scalar potential function, noting a discrepancy between their derivation and Roshen's equation II.6. The key issue is the presence of the variable 'y' in BlackMelon's formula, which is absent in Roshen's, leading to questions about potential typographical errors in the reference material.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic circuits and core saturation principles
  • Familiarity with the BH curve and its implications in transformer design
  • Knowledge of LaPlace expansions and their application in electromagnetic theory
  • Experience with scalar potential functions in magnetic field calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the paper "Magnetic Field Intensity in Air Gaps" by Roshen (2007) for detailed derivations
  • Study the principles of core saturation and its effects on transformer efficiency
  • Learn about LaPlace transformations in electromagnetic applications
  • Explore advanced techniques for analyzing magnetic circuits, such as the Legendre method
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, power supply designers, and researchers in electromagnetic theory seeking to deepen their understanding of transformer core design and magnetic field analysis.

BlackMelon
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
Hi there!

Sorry for the unclear images in the previous post. This time I upload pdf files for my derivation and the reference paper.

So, when I design a switching power supply, usually I make an air gap at the transformer's core. This will alter the BH curve, preventing the core saturation. However, as I increase the gap's length, the fluxes fringes. So, the reluctance of the air gap is not high enough to alter the BH curve as I expected.

To solve the problem, I read a paper by Roshen (file Roshen2007.pdf) and derive formulae inside that paper (file Formulae Derivation... .pdf).
I got a mismatch of scalar potential function (equation II.6 in both files).

On the last page of my derivation, I got a term Hg*y/2.
On the second page of Roshen's paper, this term is Hg/lg

I would like to know why Roshen did not put the variable y on that term?

Best Regards,
BlackMelon
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like a typo in Roshen, but I couldn't follow the expansion completely.
 
Charles Link said:
Looks to me like a typo in Roshen, but I couldn't follow the expansion completely.

May I know which part of my expansion is confusing?
 
BlackMelon said:
May I know which part of my expansion is confusing?
I don't have much expertise at doing the LaPlace expansions, both the integer one, and the continuous one. I'm somewhat familiar with the Legendre type method of solution, and I think this one is similar to that, but I have little expertise with it.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K