Magnetic field of an infinite sheet of current

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the magnetic field produced by an infinite sheet of current with a surface current density \( J_s \) in the positive z-direction. The magnetic field \( B \) near the sheet is established to be parallel to the sheet and perpendicular to the current direction, with a magnitude of \( B = \frac{\mu_{0} J_{s}}{2} \). The application of Ampère's law is crucial, particularly in selecting a closed path that leverages symmetry to maintain a constant magnetic field along the path. The importance of choosing a rectangular loop perpendicular to the z-direction is emphasized to ensure that the current passes through the loop.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampère's Law for magneto-statics
  • Familiarity with magnetic field concepts and vector calculus
  • Knowledge of current density and its implications in electromagnetism
  • Ability to visualize and analyze symmetry in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Ampère's Law in different geometries
  • Explore the concept of magnetic fields generated by various current distributions
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate applications of magnetic fields in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and magnetic field analysis.

JHans
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
An infinite sheet of current lying in the yz plane carries a surface current of linear density Js. The current is in the positive z direction, and Js represents the current per unit length measured along the y axis. Prove that the magnetic field near the sheet is parallel to the sheet and perpendicular to the current direction, with magnitude:

<br /> <br /> B = \frac{\mu_{0} J_{s}}{2}<br /> <br />

To solve this, I know that Ampere's law should be used. It's intuitive from the right-hand rule that the direction of the magnetic field will be parallel to the sheet at points near the sheet. I'm at a loss in terms of how I can go about proving this derivation, though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you need to do is to pick a closed path. It's okay to break up the path into a few sections if you need to, as long as all the sections connect together making a closed path. The goal is to pick a path such that due to symmetry, each section of the path has a constant B, parallel to the path.

Ampère's law for magneto-statics (and in a vacuum) is

\oint _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \mu _0 I.

And remember, the closed path integral can be broken up into several open path integrals, each corresponding to a section of the path, as long as all the integrals form a closed path when put together.

Let's concentrate on the left side of the equation. The goal is that for any given section, \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} is a constant. And just to be clear, \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} is not usually a constant -- you need to pick the pick the appropriate path that makes it a constant.

Let's take the situation where, due to symmetry, the magnitude of B is a constant along the path section, and B is perfectly parallel to dl. Then,

\int _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \int Bdl = B \int dl = Bl

Now suppose in a different section in the path B is perpendicular to dl. The dot product between perpendicular vectors is zero. So in this case,

\int _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \int 0 = 0

Given the above, here are a few hints:
  • For your path, try a rectangle.
  • Ampère's law will give you μ0 times the current passing through the rectangle. So make sure the rectangle passes through the sheet/plane (otherwise there wouldn't be any current inside of the rectangle).
  • Even though the plane is infinite, the rectangle doesn't have to be. Let's just assume that the rectangle has a finite length l. But the fact that the plane is infinite is very important, particular when dealing with a couple of sides of the rectangle. So keep in back of your mind that the plane/sheet is infinite in size, even though the rectangle is not.
  • Since the rectangle has 4 sides, feel free to break up the closed path into 4 separate path integrals if you want.
 
Last edited:
Hmm... well, since the infinite sheet of current is along the yz-plane, with current moving in the positive z-direction, it would seem to make sense to construct a rectangular loop along the xz-plane. Then the vertical sides would have the magnetic field perpendicular to the direction of movement, while the horizontal sides would have the magnetic field parallel to the direction of movement.

Is this a wise choice to make? I want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I go further.
 
JHans said:
Hmm... well, since the infinite sheet of current is along the yz-plane, with current moving in the positive z-direction, it would seem to make sense to construct a rectangular loop along the xz-plane. Then the vertical sides would have the magnetic field perpendicular to the direction of movement, while the horizontal sides would have the magnetic field parallel to the direction of movement.

Is this a wise choice to make? I want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I go further.
You don't want the rectangular loop on the xz plane. The reason is because in that case, there wouldn't be any current going through the loop. The current would merely go across the side of the loop, but not through the loop.

The current is moving in the z-direction. So for the rectangular path, you want to pick a plane perpendicular to the z-direction (i.e. a plane that has a normal vector parallel to the z-direction). That way, current passes through the rectangle.

Ampère's law only gives you the current passing through the closed path. Any current outside the closed path does not contribute.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K