Magnetic field of vector potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the curl of a vector potential in three-dimensional space, specifically addressing the magnetic field derived from vector potential. The user successfully computed the curl in the i and j directions, yielding results of 3xz/r5 and 3yz/r5. However, confusion arose when calculating the final curl, leading to an incorrect expression. The resolution involved recognizing the relationship between r2 and the Cartesian coordinates, ultimately clarifying the differentiation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly curl operations
  • Familiarity with the concept of vector potential in electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of partial differentiation and its application in three-dimensional space
  • Basic understanding of the relationship between Cartesian coordinates and spherical coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of curl in vector fields
  • Explore the derivation of magnetic fields from vector potentials
  • Learn about the implications of vector calculus in electromagnetism
  • Investigate the use of computational tools like Symbolab for verifying calculus operations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as mathematicians working with vector calculus and differential equations.

TheBigDig
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Using the vector potential A, show that the Cartesian representation of the magnetic induction field associated with a magnetic moment oriented along the Cartesian z-axis is B
Relevant Equations
[tex]\vec{B} = \nabla \times \vec{A}[/tex]
[tex]\vec{A} = \frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{m_z}{r^3} (-y,x,0)[/tex]
[tex]\vec{B} = \frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{m_z}{r^5} (3xz, 3yz, 3z^2-r^2)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{1}{r^3} = -\frac{3x}{r^5}[/tex]
So I was able to do out the curl in the i and j direction and got 3xz/r5 and 3yz/r5 as expected. However, when I do out the last curl, I do not get 3z2-3r2. I get the following
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{x}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^\frac{3}{2}} = \frac{-2x^2+y^2+z^2}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^\frac{5}{2}}
\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \frac{-y}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^\frac{3}{2}} = \frac{-2y^2+x^2+z^2}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^\frac{5}{2}}
which when added together gives me
\frac{-x^2-y^2+2z^2}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^\frac{5}{2}}.

I can't see where I've gone wrong with this differentiation. I've tried it out on symbolab and get the same result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it be that your answer is equivalent to what you are trying to get?
 
Expand ##r^2## in terms of x y and z ...
 
Good God, I'm a moron. Thanks to you both. I got it out there

EDIT: For those interested:
r^2=x^2+y^2+z^2
-x^2-y^2 = z^2 -r^2
and then sub back in
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
907