Magnetic Flux in a Coaxial Cable

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the magnetic flux in a coaxial cable, specifically why the magnetic field generated by the outer conductor does not contribute to the flux through a rectangular surface between the conductors. It is established that Ampere's Law indicates the magnetic field from the outer conductor is zero due to the absence of current passing through the circular loop defined by the inner conductor. The radial symmetry of the system confirms that the tangential component of the magnetic field is also zero, supported by Biot-Savart's Law and Gauss's Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampere's Law in integral form
  • Familiarity with Biot-Savart's Law
  • Knowledge of Gauss's Law
  • Concept of magnetic field symmetry in coaxial cables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Ampere's Law in various geometries
  • Explore the implications of Biot-Savart's Law in different current configurations
  • Investigate the principles of magnetic field cancellation in conductors
  • Learn about the practical applications of coaxial cables in electromagnetic systems
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and professionals working with electromagnetic theory and coaxial cable design will benefit from this discussion.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,202
Reaction score
7,685
Let's say we have a coaxial cable with a 2d rectangular surface lying between the inner and outer conductors and running the length of the cable. I'm trying to understand why the magnetic flux through this surface only includes the magnetic field generated by the current flowing through the center conductor and not the outer conductor. I'm assuming the fields from the current running through the outer conductor cancel out somehow. Is it just that simple?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ampere's law in integral form is perhaps the easiest way to show the magnetic field from the outer conductor is zero. A circular cross section works best, so that the radial symmetry can be applied. Ampere's law in integral form says: ## \oint B \cdot dl =\mu_o I ## where ## I ## is the current through the loop and the integral is around the loop. If there is no current passing through the circular loop (from the outer conductor), by symmetry ## B=0 ##. (At least the tangential component.) Meanwhile, ## B_z=0 ## because the motion of the moving electrical charges is in the z-direction. (by Biot-Savart's law, the ## v \times r ## in the numerator of the Biot-Savart equation for ## B ## tells us that any ## B ## will be perpendicular to ## v ##. Finally ## B_r=0 ## can be shown by using ## \nabla \cdot B=0 ## along with Gauss's law.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: peroAlex, cnh1995 and Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
802
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K