Magnetic Flux through a Rectangular Loop Due to a Straight Wire

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic flux through a rectangular loop due to a straight wire carrying current I. For part (a), the integration of the magnetic field is necessary to determine the flux, which involves considering the cylindrical symmetry of the magnetic field around the wire. The flux is calculated by integrating the infinitesimal flux across the loop's area, specifically from the distance h to h+w. In part (b), the induced emf is determined based on a time-varying current, with specific values given for constants. The direction of the induced current in the rectangle is also a key point of discussion, emphasizing the relationship between changing magnetic fields and induced currents.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A loop of wire in the shape of a rectangle of width w and length L and a long, straight wire carrying a current I lie on a tabletop as shown in the figure below.

(a) Determine the magnetic flux through the loop due to the current I. (Use any variable stated above along with the following as necessary: μ0 and π.)

(b) Suppose the current is changing with time according to I = a + bt, where a and b are constants. Determine the magnitude of the emf that is induced in the loop if b = 19.0 A/s, h = 1.00 cm, w = 14.0 cm, and L = 1.50 m.

(c) What is the direction of the induced current in the rectangle?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a), the answer involves integrating h to h+w. I honestly do not understand why this is so. Wouldn't this calculation include the flux through the region between the wire carrying the current and the loop? I would certainly appreciate it if someone Could someone explain the rationale that accompanies this calculation.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    3.5 KB · Views: 668
Physics news on Phys.org
The field around the straight wire has cilindrical symmetry, and you can find it out with the usual formula. It will depend only on the distance from the wire. Now the flux (in case the field is constant) is simply the product of the area and the field, as the field vector and the normal to the area will be parallel (due to the above mentioned cilindrical symmetry) and then the scalar product is simply the product of moduli.

Given this, you are able to compute the flux through an infinitesimal rectangular area at distance ##r## from the wire as
$$ F=B(r)L\mathrm{d}r $$
Now simply integrate this infinitesimal flux where you need it, therefore between ##r=h## and ##r=h+w##. In practice what you are doing is to sum all the infinitesimal fluxes internal to the loop you have. And no, to consider also the contribution of the part between the wire and the loofa, you should start integrating at ##r=0##.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
948
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K