Magnetic Force on Moving Parallel Plate Capacitor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic force exerted on the positive plate of a moving parallel plate capacitor, which travels at a speed of 31 m/s through a 4.0 T magnetic field. The electric field within the capacitor is 170 N/C, and the area of each plate is 7.5 x 10^-4 m². The magnetic force is derived using the formula F = Bqv, where the charge (q) is calculated from the electric field and plate area using Gauss's Law. The final magnetic force is determined to be 2.79e-10 N after correctly applying the electric field equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric fields in parallel plate capacitors
  • Knowledge of magnetic force equations (F = Bqv)
  • Basic proficiency in algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gauss's Law applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field and charge density in capacitors
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the formula F = Bqv
  • Investigate the effects of magnetic fields on moving charges
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of capacitors in magnetic fields.

jason.maran
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The drawing shows a parallel plate capacitor that is moving with a speed of 31 m/s through a 4.0 T magnetic field. The velocity v is perpendicular to the magnetic field. The electric field within the capacitor has a value of 170 N/C and each plate has an area of 7.5 multiplied by 10 x 10^-4 m^2. What is the magnetic force (magnitude and direction) exerted on the positive plate of the capacitor?

21_80.gif

Homework Equations


F = Bqvsin(theta) --- sin() isn't important in this case because it's perpendicular

Then there's also E = F/q and C = KEoA/d, but I can't for the life of me figure out how to use it in this case.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I've established that I'm going to need to find the charge somehow from the electric field and the area of the plates, since all the other info for F = Bvq is given. I'm at a loss to figure out how to get the charge though... thanks in advance for any help/advice.
 

Attachments

  • 21_80.gif
    21_80.gif
    1 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
You're completely correct. As it turns out, if you draw a Guassian cylinder or cube that extends halfway into one of the (conducting) capacitor plates and apply Gauss's Law, you'll find that the electric field from one plate is always \sigma/2\epsilon_0, where \sigma is the charge density of the plate (charge over area). If you add to this value the field from the other plate, you'll find that inside a parallel plate capacitor, the electric field always has a value of \sigma/\epsilon_0. So given your value for the electric field and the areas of the plates, you can now calculate the charge on the positive plate.
 
Thanks for your help, swuster. I'm still having a bit of trouble though.

I've done the following now:

E = (q/A)/2Eo
170 = (q/7.5e-4)/(2 * 8.85e-12)
q = 2.25e-12 C

Then I substitute in and solve for F:
F = qvB = (2.25e-12)(31)(4) = 2.79e-10 N, which is wrong, unfortunately.

I feel like I missed a step when following your instructions, and I didn't quite follow this bit:
If you add to this value the field from the other plate, you'll find that inside a parallel plate capacitor, the electric field always has a value of LaTeX Code: \\sigma/\\epsilon_0 .
Thanks again for the help, I appreciate it greatly! :)
 
jason.maran said:
E = (q/A)/2Eo

Should be:

E = (q/A)/Eo

^_^
 
Ah, OK, thanks a bunch! Worked like a charm after that!
 
Yep - between the capacitor plates, the electric field adds!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K