Magnetic resonances of different steel grades

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the magnetic resonances of 304 and 316 stainless steel grades. Both alloys are primarily austenitic and exhibit very weak ferromagnetic properties, with 304 showing more potential for ferromagnetism than 316, especially in variants with higher carbon content. Cold working can enhance the ferromagnetic characteristics of these alloys, leading to a partial transformation from austenite to martensite. Notably, 316L, while hardening through cold work, remains minimally ferromagnetic, challenging traditional metallurgical claims.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of austenitic and ferritic stainless steel properties
  • Knowledge of cold working processes and their effects on metal alloys
  • Familiarity with the concepts of martensitic transformation
  • Basic principles of magnetism in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of cold working on 304 and 316 stainless steel
  • Explore the differences in magnetic properties between austenitic and ferritic stainless steels
  • Study the role of carbon content in the transformation of stainless steel alloys
  • Investigate the metallurgical implications of martensitic transformation in stainless steels
USEFUL FOR

Metallurgists, materials scientists, engineers, and anyone involved in the manufacturing or application of stainless steel alloys.

forestkindred
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok folks, newbie here, with ideas of granduer.
I need to find out if the magnetic resonances of 304 stainless and 316 stainless. I know that the differnet compositions of metal alloys will have diferent magnetic properties. ie, the amount of iron ferrite in stainless should have a corresponding value to differentiate the different types.
thank you in advance for your patience. I don't really know a whole lot about physics. please put your answers into terms a carpenter can understand. Layman's terms.

Thank you, Jason
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't expect any magnetic resonance from 304 nor 316. Both are initially austenitic, never ferritic, and very weakly ferromagnetic. They can become more ferromagnetic if cold-worked; 316 little, 304 more, especially the variants with more carbon (=not 316L).

This is said to relate with the partial transformation from austenite into martensite, which is ferromagnetic. Sure! As far as metallurgy is a science...

In these alloys, carbon eases the transformation into martensite by cold work, but nickel opposes, hence 304 > 304L > 316 > 316L.

One note: 316L does harden by cold work, though it stays very little ferromagnetic, which would imply that the hardening process is NOT martensitic transformation - as opposed to what textbooks claim. 316L can become as hard as any other, it just needs more deformation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K