Magnetism / Electromagnet Levitation question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of magnetism and the feasibility of achieving stable levitation of magnets, particularly through the use of electromagnets and gyroscopic stabilization. Participants explore various methods and challenges associated with magnetic levitation, including both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to suspend a magnet in mid-air using another magnet above it, seeking thoughts on the feasibility of this setup.
  • Another participant cites Earnshaw's theorem, suggesting that stable levitation using only static, macroscopic, paramagnetic fields is not possible.
  • Some participants discuss the instability of magnetic levitation, comparing it to a pencil balancing on its point, and suggest that feedback control systems could be used to maintain levitation.
  • There is mention of using repulsion from magnets below to oppose gravity, which could be a passive method, but it requires multiple magnets or a complex structure to stabilize the levitated object.
  • A participant references a gyroscopic stabilization method that allows for stable levitation, questioning if it can be achieved with the gyroscopic device positioned above the levitated object.
  • One participant shares a personal experience of building a levitating globe using an electromagnet and discusses the technical aspects of their setup, including position sensing and control circuitry.
  • Another participant expresses interest in creating a light fixture with levitating elements, inquiring about the design and power supply for such a project.
  • One participant proposes that spinning the levitating object could help balance the unstable magnetic positioning, suggesting the use of induction coils or air blowing to maintain rotation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods for achieving stable magnetic levitation. Multiple competing views and approaches are presented, with some participants agreeing on the challenges while others propose different solutions or methods.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the limitations of current methods, such as the need for position sensing and the challenges of maintaining stable levitation without friction. There are also unresolved questions regarding the power supply for levitating devices and the implications of using different configurations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring magnetic levitation, those involved in experimental physics, engineering students, and hobbyists interested in building levitating devices or understanding the principles of magnetism.

stevanlieberman
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Can one support one magnet so it does not move hanging below an electromagnetic strip say a foot away from the strip so it does not fall and is there a formula for this?
I can make one magnet ‘leap’ up to another magnet and I can push one magnet away with another magnet but can’t figure out how to do both at the same time so the first magnet can essentially be suspended in mid air with the controlling magnet being above. Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Earnshaw's theorem proved conclusively that it is not possible to levitate stably using only static, macroscopic, paramagnetic fields
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
It's unstable, like a pencil standing on it's point. The more the magnet falls, the less lifting force there is. You can do it with position sensing and feedback control of the field strength.

You can do the reverse with repulsion from magnets below opposing gravity, which can be passive. You'll need multiple magnets or a complex structure to keep the magnet in the center.

Like these:
https://www.maglev.net/best-maglev-toys-and-gadgets
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stevanlieberman and hutchphd
DaveE said:
It's unstable, like a pencil standing on it's point. The more the magnet falls, the less lifting force there is. You can do it with position sensing and feedback control of the field strength.

You also do the reverse with repulsion from magnets below opposing gravity, which can be passive. You'll need multiple magnets or a complex structure to keep the magnet in the center.

Like these:
https://www.maglev.net/best-maglev-toys-and-gadgets
Wait. Now I'm not so sure. Magnetic levitation is more complicated than I thought. For example, you need some force to keep the levitated magnet from rolling over.

Perhaps an experiment tonight...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stevanlieberman
It says “ levitation A magnet or properly assembled array of magnets can be stably levitated against gravity when gyroscopically stabilized by spinning it in a toroidal field created by a base ring of magnet(s)”

But all of the devices cited do it from the bottom up. I am wondering if it can be done with the gyroscopic device is above the thing being levitated?
 
Oh they have one from above. How are they moving the electricity into the bulb? Thanks
 
stevanlieberman said:
Oh they have one from above. How are they moving the electricity into the bulb? Thanks
The same way your phone charges wirelessly. You don't have to have wires to transfer energy with electromagnetism. If you did your radio wouldn't work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stevanlieberman
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=levitating+globe+magnetic

Many years ago, I built one with an electromagnet above a globe of the Moon (about 6 inches diameter). You could start the Moon spinning and with no friction it would keep going.

The fun part was I put a noise-maker circuit inside the Moon globe connected to a tilt sensor. During a demonstration, I would invite someone to take the Moon out and then replace it. Not knowing what to do, they would often freeze when the noise-maker started!

I used a beam of light and a large (1.25 inches, 3.2cm. square) photocell to sense the vertical position of the globe. The electromagnet was wound with five pounds of 14 gauge (AWG) wire (about 400ft., 120m.).

The control circuit was a full wave bridge rectifier with phase control, fed from the wall power outlet (same approach as a lamp dimmer, but they feed AC to the lamp). Feeding DC to the electromagnet allowed a much higher current, and stronger field, than AC would have.

Have Fun!
Tom
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
I would have loved to have seen that. My goal is to create a light fixture that has what looks like spinning balls of light hanging a foot from the ceiling and every 5 feet across a 30 foot room. It sounds like your moo globe did everything I am trying to do. Did you ever write down the design? Thanks
 
  • #10
@stevanlieberman

I think I still have the main parts around here somewhere.

But you must realize that the position sensing is a light shining on a photocell and the suspended globe blocks part of the the light to the photocell. That means you will have posts hanging from the ceiling for each suspended item. (or a significant alignment problem if the lights and sensors are on walls 15 feet away)

Also the spacing between the electromagnet and the globe was around 6 inches (15cm), and the electromagnet ran too hot for continuous operation. Of course a globe that weighed less or was closer to the electromagnet would decrease the current and the temperature rise.

How are you planning to get power to the lamps?

Still Interested?
Are you comfortable and experienced working with powerline voltages?

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • #11


You can have a levitating object with permanent fields you just need the object to be spinning like the spinning top so that the gyro effect balances the unstable magnetic positioning.
Since this has no friction I'm sure a small induction type stator coil could be used to make the object spin continually or something like that , maybe even air blowing on the object
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and hutchphd

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K