Magnetostatics Anomalie: Infinite Surface Currents

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Void123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of magnetic fields generated by infinite surface currents in magnetostatics, specifically addressing the absence of a vertical (z) component of the magnetic field. According to Griffiths, the vertical components cancel out due to the superposition of point source currents, which create dipole magnetic fields. The explanation highlights that while the magnetic field in the x-y plane points along the z direction for point sources, the infinite arrangement of these currents leads to cancellation of the z components. This phenomenon is analogous to the magnetic field produced by a current ring, which only has an axial component along its axis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetostatics principles
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics"
  • Knowledge of magnetic dipole fields
  • Concept of superposition in electromagnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of magnetic fields from infinite current sheets
  • Explore the concept of magnetic dipoles in greater detail
  • Learn about the application of Ampère's Law in magnetostatics
  • Investigate the behavior of magnetic fields in different geometries, such as rings and loops
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to magnetic fields and surface currents.

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
I have been looking at a problem in magnetostatics about sheets of infinite surface current, positioned along the xy plane. Now clearly there is an Amperian loop parallel to the yz-plane. I understand why there would be no x component of the magnetic field, but I don't understand why there would be no z (vertical) component. According to Griffiths, they 'cancel out' or through a clever argument he uses: the direction of the current cannot affect the vertical component. Either way, I don't understand the logic at work here.

Would appreciate some feedback.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic source of a magnetic field is a dipole. So a point source current is going to create a dipole magnetic field, whose field lines look like dees. So if the point source is at the origin pointing in the z direction, then the magnetic field in the x-y plane will point along the z direction too. Only for z =\= 0 will the field have an x and/or y component.

So conceptually you can visualize the current sheet as an infinite superposition of these point source currents. If we have two point sources located one behind the other, say:

Code:
^
|

^
|

Then the fields will be something like:

Code:
   ___
 /      \       
|       |     
|       |       
|       |     +          _____
 \_____ /               /      \       
                       |       |     
                       |       |       
                       |       |     
                        \_____/     

 =

  _____
 /      \       
|       |     
|       |       
|       |          
|       |     
|       |       
|       |     
 \_____/
The dees are offset slightly along the direction of the current (not in the normal direction asI have done above). This means that the components near the ends of the dees cancel each other out. If this occurs over an infinite sheet, the adjacent currents will cancel out all the z components. It is similar to why a ring of current's magnetic field along the ring's axis is only in the axial direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
512
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
92
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K