1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Maintaining constant Potential Energy

  1. Jan 23, 2010 #1
    Hi all,

    While thinking about potential energy and force, I couldn't figure out how to maintain an object at a constant height above the ground i.e to maintain a constant potential energy.

    I know that potential energy will be equal to the amount of workdone to lift the object to a particular height (considering gravity) but W = F x displacement. But to maintain an object at a constant potential energy (height), displacement = 0 & hence no work or energy is required.
    If that is right, why does helicopters expend energy (fuel), to stay at a particular height?

    Also consider an object on ground, what is the exact action taking place if the same magnitude of force as that of gravity is applied in the upward direction?
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 23, 2010 #2
    An upthrust is required to counteract gravity.Helicopters do that by forcing air, but air being a fluid constantly moves and is replaced so constant power is to be delivered
  4. Jan 26, 2010 #3
    Work is defined as force times distance, W = fd, so NO work is done. Energy and power, via the consumption of fuel, IS expended.

    When you stand still, or sit, for example, no work is done to the extent you are not undergoing translation (no movement). But you are burning calories,energy, just to maintain body functions and stay alive. Of course some movement IS taking place inside you as blood circulates, your lungs expand and contract, and your heart beats...
  5. Jan 26, 2010 #4
    I think it is not good to mix up the energy and the force.. say that you are lifting a stone against the gravity.. then as you and I have heard we can use E=Fx to find the energy.. but here it has assumed that the lifting process has done in uniform velocity.. that is why E=Fx and not E=Fx + 1/2 m*v*v ,(here the v is the final velocity which the stone takes), anyway what im pointing out is you are lifting the stone against the gravity and using the same force as the weight of the stone.. that same force is applied by your hand.. so the two fores are equal and ni resultant force.. so the uniform velocity assumption is there (here the motionless situation cant be assumed , because the stone is moving). anyway mg=F, F is the force by your hand, then E=Fx , which gives the energy you wasted (give) for the lifting and stored in the stone..
    E=Fx=mg*x, then you will have the known equation 'E=mgh'... this only gives which amount of energy that stone stored.. lets come to your point... say that you
    took your hand away, what happens now.. the stone will face to the force field by the earths (gravitational force).. if there is no a hand to give an equal reaction as the weight
    (or reaction by the wings of helicopter), the stone will fell (accelerate) to the down and it will be a free fall.. which convert its potential energy to the kinetic energy.. and in your case the helicopter spend fuel to provide that equal force, .. not like the hand which keeps the stone in stable situation(when the stone is in the final place).. helicopter have to do a work(against the air) for rotating the wings.. that is why it has to spend fuel...I think that this will be a support for your problem...
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook