Manipulation of Arbitrary Constants in Differential Equations

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation yy'' + (y')² = 0 using variable separation. The initial steps lead to the expression -ln|v| = ln|y| + C1, and the user questions the treatment of the constant C1 when exponentiating both sides. It is clarified that e^C1 remains an arbitrary constant, which can be relabeled as C2, simplifying the equation to 1/v = C2y. The conversation highlights that some texts avoid complicating the notation by reusing constants, adhering to a "conservation of constants" approach. This understanding aids in resolving the confusion regarding the manipulation of arbitrary constants in the solution process.
Bill Nye Tho
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:

- ln |v| = ln |y| + C1

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill Nye Tho said:

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:

- ln |v| = ln |y| + C1

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
\displaystyle e^{C_{\,1}}\ is positive, otherwise it's as arbitrary as using a redefined C1 .
 
Bill Nye Tho said:

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:
-ln|v|= ln|y|+ C1
You could, at this point, take the exponential of both sides:
e^{-ln|v|}= e^{ln|y|+ C_1}
\frac{1}{|v|}= e^{C_1}|y|
Now, as you say, since C1 is an arbitrary constant, so is e^{C_1} so let's just call it "C2". And if allow C2 to be either positive or negative, it we can drop the absolute values: \frac{1}{v}= C_2y which is, of course, the same as yv= \frac{1}{C_2} or yv= C_3 where C_3= 1/C_2.
Some texts just don't bother to label the different constants differently.

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
 
HallsofIvy said:
You could, at this point, take the exponential of both sides:
e^{-ln|v|}= e^{ln|y|+ C_1}
\frac{1}{|v|}= e^{C_1}|y|
Now, as you say, since C1 is an arbitrary constant, so is e^{C_1} so let's just call it "C2". And if allow C2 to be either positive or negative, it we can drop the absolute values: \frac{1}{v}= C_2y which is, of course, the same as yv= \frac{1}{C_2} or yv= C_3 where C_3= 1/C_2.
Some texts just don't bother to label the different constants differently.

That makes sense, thank you.

Seems like they just don't want things to get messy so they reuse the same constants.
 
A "conservation of constants" law!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K