Manipulation of Arbitrary Constants in Differential Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the manipulation of arbitrary constants in the context of solving the differential equation yy'' + (y')² = 0. Participants are exploring the implications of constants during the solution process, particularly in relation to variable separation and the exponential function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of taking the exponential of both sides after applying logarithms, questioning why some solutions do not explicitly raise the constant to the exponential form. There is a focus on the nature of arbitrary constants and their transformations during the solution process.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the treatment of constants, suggesting that constants can be redefined without loss of generality. There is an acknowledgment of the potential for confusion regarding the reuse of constants in different forms.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of arbitrary constants in their solutions and how different texts may handle these constants differently. The discussion reflects a shared understanding of the mathematical principles involved, while also recognizing the potential for varying interpretations.

Bill Nye Tho
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:

- ln |v| = ln |y| + C1

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill Nye Tho said:

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:

- ln |v| = ln |y| + C1

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
[itex]\displaystyle e^{C_{\,1}}\[/itex] is positive, otherwise it's as arbitrary as using a redefined C1 .
 
Bill Nye Tho said:

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:
-ln|v|= ln|y|+ C1
You could, at this point, take the exponential of both sides:
[itex]e^{-ln|v|}= e^{ln|y|+ C_1}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{|v|}= e^{C_1}|y|[/itex]
Now, as you say, since C1 is an arbitrary constant, so is [itex]e^{C_1}[/itex] so let's just call it "C2". And if allow C2 to be either positive or negative, it we can drop the absolute values: [itex]\frac{1}{v}= C_2y[/itex] which is, of course, the same as [itex]yv= \frac{1}{C_2}[/itex] or [itex]yv= C_3[/itex] where [itex]C_3= 1/C_2[/itex].
Some texts just don't bother to label the different constants differently.

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
 
HallsofIvy said:
You could, at this point, take the exponential of both sides:
[itex]e^{-ln|v|}= e^{ln|y|+ C_1}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{|v|}= e^{C_1}|y|[/itex]
Now, as you say, since C1 is an arbitrary constant, so is [itex]e^{C_1}[/itex] so let's just call it "C2". And if allow C2 to be either positive or negative, it we can drop the absolute values: [itex]\frac{1}{v}= C_2y[/itex] which is, of course, the same as [itex]yv= \frac{1}{C_2}[/itex] or [itex]yv= C_3[/itex] where [itex]C_3= 1/C_2[/itex].
Some texts just don't bother to label the different constants differently.

That makes sense, thank you.

Seems like they just don't want things to get messy so they reuse the same constants.
 
A "conservation of constants" law!
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K