Manipulation of Arbitrary Constants in Differential Equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Bill Nye Tho
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:

- ln |v| = ln |y| + C1

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill Nye Tho said:

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:

- ln |v| = ln |y| + C1

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
[itex]\displaystyle e^{C_{\,1}}\[/itex] is positive, otherwise it's as arbitrary as using a redefined C1 .
 
Bill Nye Tho said:

Homework Statement



yy''+(y')2 = 0

Homework Equations



yv(dv/dy)+v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Variable separable when solving for the first step the result is:
-ln|v|= ln|y|+ C1
You could, at this point, take the exponential of both sides:
[itex]e^{-ln|v|}= e^{ln|y|+ C_1}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{|v|}= e^{C_1}|y|[/itex]
Now, as you say, since C1 is an arbitrary constant, so is [itex]e^{C_1}[/itex] so let's just call it "C2". And if allow C2 to be either positive or negative, it we can drop the absolute values: [itex]\frac{1}{v}= C_2y[/itex] which is, of course, the same as [itex]yv= \frac{1}{C_2}[/itex] or [itex]yv= C_3[/itex] where [itex]C_3= 1/C_2[/itex].
Some texts just don't bother to label the different constants differently.

Now, I've looked at the remainder of the solution with a few other sources and the cause of my mistake results in the constant.

After turning the equation into: ln |vy| + C1 = 0;

I raise everything to the e so that I can solve for v.

It seems all the solutions do that as well but yet they don't raise the constant to the e.

Is it because eC1 will still be a constant and therefore completely arbitrary?
 
HallsofIvy said:
You could, at this point, take the exponential of both sides:
[itex]e^{-ln|v|}= e^{ln|y|+ C_1}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{|v|}= e^{C_1}|y|[/itex]
Now, as you say, since C1 is an arbitrary constant, so is [itex]e^{C_1}[/itex] so let's just call it "C2". And if allow C2 to be either positive or negative, it we can drop the absolute values: [itex]\frac{1}{v}= C_2y[/itex] which is, of course, the same as [itex]yv= \frac{1}{C_2}[/itex] or [itex]yv= C_3[/itex] where [itex]C_3= 1/C_2[/itex].
Some texts just don't bother to label the different constants differently.

That makes sense, thank you.

Seems like they just don't want things to get messy so they reuse the same constants.