MHB Manipulation of negative square root of a negative term/#

hatelove
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have to solve for y:

x\leq 1

(x - 1)^{2} = y

So I know that (x - 1) will always be 0 or a negative, therefore I must take the negative square root of (x - 1):

-\sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -\sqrt{y}

Am I to understand that this is the same as:

-1 \cdot \sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
=
-1 \cdot (x - 1) = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
=
-x + 1 = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}

Or how does this work?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
daigo said:
Suppose I have to solve for y:

x\leq 1

(x - 1)^{2} = y

So I know that (x - 1) will always be 0 or a negative, therefore I must take the negative square root of (x - 1):

-\sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -\sqrt{y}

Am I to understand that this is the same as:

-1 \cdot \sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
=
-1 \cdot (x - 1) = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
=
-x + 1 = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}

Or how does this work?

Do you have another example? The equation you've given already has y as the subject.

For the equation $y = (x-1)^2$ where $x \leq 1$ you can deduce that $y \geq 0$ (in other words the range of the function is $f(x) \geq 0$)

As you said you must take the negative root of $x$ but not of $y$ because $y$ is always non-negative so we take the positive square root. In essence I'm not sure what you want to do with the equation? Do you want to solve for x (and basically find the inverse function)? If you do then remember the domain and range are swapped.

One of the easier things to do is consider and ordered pair.
$f(x) = (x-1)^2$
$f(0) = (0-1)^2 = 1$

So (0,1) is an ordered pair. If we try this in your final equation (which you've done correctly bar taking the negative root of y): $-0+1 = -1 \cdot \sqrt{1} \rightarrow 1 \neq -1$ so that equation doesn't hold.

If you took the positive root of y (ending up with $-x+1 = \sqrt{y} \rightarrow -0+1 = \sqrt{1} $ which works. Try it for another ordered pair (but remember that $y \geq 0$)
 
daigo said:
Suppose I have to solve for y:

x\leq 1

(x - 1)^{2} = y

So I know that (x - 1) will always be 0 or a negative, therefore I must take the negative square root of (x - 1):

-\sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -\sqrt{y}

Am I to understand that this is the same as:

-1 \cdot \sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
=
-1 \cdot (x - 1) = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
This is an error \sqrt{(x-1)^2}= |x- 1| not x- 1. Here, since x-1< 0, |x- 1|= -(x- 1) so what you should have is
-1(-(x-1))= x-1= -\sqrt{y}

=
-x + 1 = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
This can't be right because if x< 1, -x+ 1> 0 and -\sqrt{y} is positive.

Or how does this work?
Again, \sqrt{x^2}= |x|.
 
daigo said:
Suppose I have to solve for y:

x\leq 1

(x - 1)^{2} = y
This is already "solved for y". Did you mean "solve for x"?

So I know that (x - 1) will always be 0 or a negative, therefore I must take the negative square root of (x - 1):

-\sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -\sqrt{y}
What?? You have squared one side and taken the square root of the other side! From \sqrt{4}= 2 it does NOT follow that 4= \sqrt{2}
What you need to do, to solve for x, is square both sides: x- 1= y^2 and form that x= 1+ y^2. It follows automatically that x is less than of equal to 1 because, with x\le 1, x- 1\le 0 so y is an imaginary number, or 0, and y^2 is less than or equal to 0.

the rest of this is relevant.
Am I to understand that this is the same as:

-1 \cdot \sqrt{(x - 1)^{2}} = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
=
-1 \cdot (x - 1) = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}
=
-x + 1 = -1 \cdot \sqrt{y}

Or how does this work?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top