Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Mathematics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Maple question: defining functions as inverse Fourier transforms
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="MathematicalPhysicist, post: 5508077, member: 72"] First thing what is ETA?, you should write ##\hat{\eta}## in this place. Second, if you read the help in maple then you should add at the beginning of the code: "[ATTACH=full]102571[/ATTACH]" I assume there's no easy term for the inverse Fourier transform of this expression, but you can get an implicit expression with integral by adding in the last place the syntax: "NO_INT". I also assume that you read already the help so I don't really no where you get it wrong, perhaps show us your code? BTW, I find mapleprimes.com as the best place for my questions regarding maple (I am not advertising it's just my experience). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Mathematics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Maple question: defining functions as inverse Fourier transforms
Back
Top