Mapping Images of Axes Under f(z) = (z+1)/(z-1)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mapping of the x and y axes under the function f(z) = (z+1)/(z-1). It is established that f is analytic everywhere except at z = 1, where it is not differentiable. The images of the axes intersect at z = 0, and the mapping is conformal wherever f is analytic. Participants emphasize the importance of computing specific points on the axes to understand the conformal nature of the mapping and the angles at which the images intersect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Understanding of analytic functions
  • Knowledge of conformal mappings
  • Ability to compute derivatives in complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Compute images of specific points on the real and imaginary axes under f(z) = (z+1)/(z-1)
  • Study the properties of conformal mappings in complex analysis
  • Learn about the implications of analyticity on the behavior of complex functions
  • Explore the concept of angles of intersection in conformal mappings
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in the properties of conformal mappings and their applications.

desaila
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f(z) = (z+1)/(z-1)
What are the images of the x and y axes under f? At what angle do the images intersect?

Homework Equations



z = x + iy

The Attempt at a Solution



This is actually a 4 part question and this is the part I don't understand at all really.
The first 2 parts were a) Where is f analytic? Compute f' for this domain. and b) Where is f conformal.

I concluded that f is not analytic because it isn't differentiable at z = 1. The derivative, d/dz = z/(z-1) - (z+1)/[(z-1)^2]. I said f' is conformal along the complex plane except where z = 1 as well. z=1 creates problems in the derivative, where you measure what is and isn't conformal and where. I'm not sure this information is relevant to the actual images though, but I thought I'd put it in anyway just in case.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f is analytic, except at z=1. It's just not holomorphic. The x and y axes intersect at z=0. That's not a point where z=1 creates a problem. And f is conformal everywhere it's analytic. Once you've actually computed the images of the axes you can confirm that it's conformal.
 
That information is indeed relevant, especially the fact the mapping will be a conformal mapping. What do you know about conformal maps? Why will this be important when we're say...computing the angles that the axes intersect?

Choose a few points on the axes, say -1, 0, 1, i, -i, and find their images under the mapping. And technically shouldn't that be the real and imaginary axes rather than the x and y axes?

In general, this mapping will send planes and circles to planes and circles, if that helps at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K