Mapping of the standard k-simplex in R^n to X

  • Thread starter Thread starter cpsinkule
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mapping Standard
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the mapping of the standard k-simplex to a topological space X, denoted by σ:Δk→X, and the concept of k-chains generated by these mappings. A chain is understood as a formal free abelian group generated by maps of Δk, where the boundary of the simplex corresponds to the restriction of the mapping to its boundary. The boundary is defined as the alternating sum of its k-1 faces, and the orientation comes from the standard orientation of the simplex in Euclidean space. There is no group action involved; instead, the focus is on the formal structure of these mappings and their boundaries. Overall, the discussion clarifies the nature of chains in this context and how they relate to simplices and their mappings.
cpsinkule
Messages
174
Reaction score
24
My book denotes by σ:Δk→X for some suitable topological space X a standard k-simplex of X. It then describes the free abelian group generated by such σ's as the group of k-chains on X. It is not clear to me what is meant by a chain for a map σ. I understand a chain in Rn to be sums of integer linear combination of simplicies, but I cannot wrap my head around what is meant by chains of mappings of Δk. Is each σ mapping Δk to different neighborhoods on X? Is the group action for chains function composition of each σ? Currently, I am understanding a chain to be a mapping of Δk multiple times into X such that they connect at their boundaries (or perhaps overlap?), but I feel like this is not the correct view. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

EDIT: I incorrectly put R^n in the title, it should be R^k to match the dimension of the simplex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I already wrote the k chains are a purely symbolic group. There is no group action.
I am not sure why you think there is.

if you take simplices to be maps of the standard simplex in Euclidean space then just form the formal free abelian group on all of these maps.

In this case, the boundary of the simplex is the restriction of the mapping to the boundary of the standard simplex in R^k.

Before I thought you were talking about a simplicial complex. Sorry for the confusion.
But the story here is essentially the same.

A map of the standard simplex in Euclidean space can be thought of as the generator of a purely formal free abelian group. One jus associates a symbol for this map and defines a group of symbols as I described in you previous post. When you consider all possible maps - in de Rham theory they are smooth maps - then one can formally talk about the free abelian group that they generate. This is an infinite dimensional free abelian group.

Orientation comes from the standard orientation of the standard k-simplex in Euclidean space.
The boundary of the standard simplex is the formal alternating sum of its k-1 faces taken in sequential order just as I described in the other post. The boundary of the mapping is the alternating sum of its restriction to each k-1 face.

So for the standard 2 simplex σ = <0,(1,0),(0,1)>

∂σ = <(1,0),(0,1)> - <0,(0,1)> + <0,(1,0)>

If f is a smooth map of σ into a manifold, then ∂f = f(∂σ) = f(<(1,0),(0,1)>)- f(<0,(0,1)>) + f(<0,(1,0)>)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
906
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K