Mass-action Law(extrinsic conductor)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahjie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor
ahjie
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
i cannot understand why product of free negative and positive concentrations is a constant independent of the amount of donor and acceptor impurities.

let say we dope in some n-type material (pentavalent) ,then the concentration of n should increase,but why ni2 still is constant ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happen to the original concentration of the material ??
i want to know it conceptually but no mathematically..thank
 
If we have a bunch of electrons in the conduction band, there's a probability that some will fall into valence band. When that happens, it's a recombination event - i.e. the a hole is filled and disappears. The more electrons you have, the more falling electrons you have. So if the number of electrons goes up, the number of holes must go down (they keep getting killed off by recombination).

The same argument applies to having a lot of holes. With so many empty states (holes) available, electrons find it easy to find a hole to fall into, so they get killed off too. Alternatively, you can think of holes "falling up" because they're positively charged and band diagrams are in negative energy (i.e. electron energy). When they fall up, they meet an electron and both go away.

So whenever one goes up, the other must go down because the chances of holes and electrons "meeting" each other increases. In intrinsic semiconductors this means their numbers are equal: n = p = ni. Donors or acceptors imbalance this, but np = ni^2 still holds until degeneracy happens. To see this relation, write n, p, and ni in terms Nc and Nv.
 
i got it now, thank very much :DD
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top