Mass & Attraction: What Happens in Empty Space?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hafiz ns
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Attraction Mass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of two massive objects in empty space, specifically regarding gravitational attraction, the nature of forces involved, and the implications of such a scenario on conservation laws and physical models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that two massive objects would attract each other due to gravity, which propagates at the speed of light.
  • Others argue that the original scenario of placing massive objects in empty space is not well-defined and violates conservation of energy, as massive objects cannot simply appear from nowhere.
  • A participant mentions that while it is theoretically possible to create mass, this concept relates to a zero energy universe and involves negative energy gravitational fields.
  • Another participant clarifies that the original poster (OP) is not suggesting that the masses appear from nowhere, comparing it to placing apples on a table.
  • There is a mention of a debate regarding whether massive objects could repel each other in certain scenarios, such as matter-antimatter interactions.
  • One participant discusses the mathematical representation of a closed universe model and its relation to gravitational potential energy, emphasizing that no mass or energy is created in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the feasibility of the scenario and the implications of gravitational attraction, with no consensus reached on the validity of the original question or the interpretations of mass creation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the assumptions made about the scenario, particularly regarding conservation laws and the definitions of mass and energy in different theoretical frameworks.

hafiz ns
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
what happens if 2 massive objects are placed in an empty space.
Does it attracts each other?
Does any change happens in its position?
If there is a force where did it come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
typically they will attract each other after some time [if we consider gravitation propagating with the speed of light].
Yes, there is change in position, coming from the geodesic equations (because of gravity acts as an inertial force)
The force will come because the objects will in general choose to follow the least action principle. Because there is gravity, they will choose to follow the geodesics I mentioned above.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Doug Huffman
hafiz ns said:
what happens if 2 massive objects are placed in an empty space.

You can't actually do this, because it would violate conservation of energy. Massive objects can't simply appear out of nowhere. So the question as you ask it isn't really well-defined; there is no consistent physical model that corresponds to it.

That said, there are plenty of other ways of posing scenarios that show that massive objects attract each other.

ChrisVer said:
typically they will attract each other after some time [if we consider gravitation propagating with the speed of light].

It is true that gravity propagates at the speed of light (at least, it does according to GR, and our best current belief is that GR is correct in this respect). However, for the reasons given above, the simple thought experiment proposed by the OP can't be used to show the speed of propagation of gravity, because it's not a consistent scenario.
 
PeterDonis said:
You can't actually do this, because it would violate conservation of energy. Massive objects can't simply appear out of nowhere. So the question as you ask it isn't really well-defined; there is no consistent physical model that corresponds to it.

Hi Peter,

True - as a practical matter - it is not possible to suddenly create a mass from nowhere ...but theoretically it costs nothing to create a mass inasmuch as the creation process also creates its negative energy G field at the same time - this was among Feynman's first musings in his lectures on gravity... that as since been embellished upon by a number of writers who support the proposition of a zero energy universe
 
I don't think the OP is insisting that these masses appear from nowhere. If I say "two apples are placed on a table", it doesn't mean they appeared out of nowhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PFuser1232
well then the "space" should be replaced, because the space could be translated to universe which contains everything. :w
It would be better to say "2 masses exist in an empty space", and not "2 masses are placed in an empty space" (placed from where?).
 
hafiz ns said:
what happens if 2 massive objects are placed in an empty space.
Does it attracts each other?
Does any change happens in its position?
If there is a force where did it come from?
They should gravitationally attract each other, albeit I read some insane peopleo0) suggested they could repel in a matter-antimatter case.
 
yogi said:
theoretically it costs nothing to create a mass inasmuch as the creation process also creates its negative energy G field at the same time

Feynman speculated about this, yes, but he was not talking about classical GR, he was talking about a possible theory of quantum gravity that hadn't even been developed yet. My statement was referring to classical GR.

yogi said:
the proposition of a zero energy universe

This has nothing to do with mass being created "out of nothing" along with a corresponding negative gravitational potential energy. It has to do with the fact that a closed universe model can be expressed mathematically in the same form as the equations for a body that is launched upward under Newtonian gravity and then freely falls. In this model, no matter or energy is created anywhere; the classical GR constraint for local energy conservation is obeyed. The "zero energy" just refers to the fact that you can choose the "zero point" of gravitational potential energy so that it always just cancels the total kinetic energy of the matter. This is a mathematical trick, not a physical statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
805
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K