Mass/energy as a condition of spacetime

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FayeKane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Spacetime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between mass, energy, and spacetime, asserting that mass and energy are conditions of spacetime rather than entities existing independently within it. Participants agree that mass and energy are fundamentally linked to space, while time is viewed as an abstraction. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer definition of actual space to fully understand the implications of relativity theory, particularly in relation to gravity and spacetime.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with spacetime theory
  • Knowledge of mass-energy equivalence
  • Basic grasp of gravitational waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of mass-energy as a condition of spacetime
  • Study the definitions and characteristics of actual space in relativity
  • Explore the concept of gravitational waves in the context of spacetime
  • Examine the differences between invariant mass and relativistic mass
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of spacetime and gravity will benefit from this discussion.

FayeKane
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Mass/energy as a "condition of spacetime"

I recently read somewhere (I think here) that mass is not something you "drop into" space, rather it's a condition of space, and that gravity waves are also a "condition of space".

a) is this correct?

b) If so, is it more generally correct to say that mass/energy is a "condition of spacetime", and specifically that the invariant-mass component is a condition of space, while the energy component is a condition of time?

c) if question b) is in fact meaningless, is there a way to rephrase the statement "mass is a condition of space" so that it that it involves time as well as space?

I forget whatever you call relativistic mass minus invariant mass because I'm Alzhammered.

--flk
 
Physics news on Phys.org


FK,

I wish you remembered where you read the observation on mass/energy/gravity/space. I would like to read it.

Space is the bete noir of relativity theoretics.

1. The physical characteristics of actual space are never well defined.
2. All references to relativity space are abstractions, i.e. imaginary geometries.
3. To conceal this fundamental flaw in the corpus of relativity theoretics, a sleight of hand, spacetime is used exclusively.
4. Mass/energy/gravity are trivial without a well articulated definition of actual space.

To answer your question both mass & energy are fundamentally related to space. Time is an abstraction.

Thanks for an insightful post,

d
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K