Mass-less particles? How can that be?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter narrator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of mass-less particles, particularly photons, and the implications of mass in particle physics. Participants explore the nature of mass, the distinction between rest mass and equivalent mass, and the characterization of particles in quantum field theory and general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how any particle can be mass-less, suggesting that it might be due to their size being immeasurable or related to their interactions.
  • It is noted that photons do not have rest mass because they are never at rest, but they possess energy which can be expressed as equivalent mass through E=mc^2.
  • One participant mentions that mass-less particles should be viewed as excitations of a quantum field rather than traditional particles without mass.
  • There is a discussion about the concept of point particles and their implications in general relativity, with some arguing that true point particles do not exist due to the nature of the equations involved.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of textbooks regarding mass-less and point particles, with some participants expressing confusion over the terminology and its implications.
  • Participants discuss the challenges of reconciling classical physics with quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the behavior of electrons and their classification as point particles.
  • Some participants express skepticism about deriving electron motion from classical physics, questioning the validity of such approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of mass and particles, with no consensus reached on the definitions and implications of mass-less and point particles. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the clarity of existing literature and the complexity of reconciling classical and quantum descriptions of particles. There are references to unresolved mathematical steps and the dependence on specific definitions of mass and particles.

  • #31
Phrak said:
The idea makes some sense, even if it is quantum mechanics. Is there a model for how the Higgs field itself has mass, or simply a required parameter of some sort?
I imagine there is, but I don't know personally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
929
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K