Does Mass Really Change with Velocity Near the Speed of Light?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of mass in the context of relativistic physics, specifically addressing whether mass changes with velocity as one approaches the speed of light. Participants clarify that "relativistic mass" is synonymous with energy, while "rest mass" or "invariant mass" remains constant regardless of speed. The formula p=ymu is referenced, where m denotes invariant mass, emphasizing the distinction between mass and energy. Understanding these terms is crucial for accurately interpreting physics texts and discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic mass and invariant mass
  • Familiarity with the concept of momentum in physics
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz factor (γ) in special relativity
  • Basic grasp of Newtonian physics for comparison
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of relativistic mass in high-energy physics
  • Study the Lorentz transformation and its effects on time and space
  • Explore the relationship between mass-energy equivalence and Einstein's theory
  • Examine specific examples of relativistic effects in particle accelerators
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching modern physics concepts, and anyone interested in the implications of relativity on mass and energy.

mike232
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,
I'm reading my modern physics book over break and I remember hearing that mass changes as you approach the speed of light. But is it really the mass that is changing or just the amount of momentum a certain mass can have. So is mass really varying or is it the energy capacity of mass that is changing with respect to velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mike232 said:
I remember hearing that mass changes as you approach the speed of light.

The "mass" that changes as your speed changes is more precisely termed "relativistic mass"; but that term is not used much in modern physics texts because it is just a synonym for "energy".

mike232 said:
is mass really varying or is it the energy capacity of mass that is changing with respect to velocity?

I'm not sure what you mean by "mass really varying" as opposed to just "energy capacity of mass" changing; if "mass" means "relativistic mass", then "mass" and "energy" are just different names for the same thing (see above).

OTOH, if "mass" means "rest mass", or better, "invariant mass", then it is an inherent property of the object and does not change as the object changes speed.
 
So by defining mass as simply confenced energy... I'm thinking of p=ymu. So because the variant mass is mass times 'demensionless velocity' the momentum increases differently than classic, the classic idea of mass changed but the rest mass, intrinsic energy of matter, doesn't change?
 
mike232 said:
by defining mass as simply confenced energy

Relativistic mass is the same as energy (not sure what you mean by "confenced"). Invariant mass is not. It's important to keep this in mind because the term "mass" and the symbol m won't always be explicitly defined as one or the other, you have to look at the context. See below.

mike232 said:
I'm thinking of p=ymu.

In this formula, m is invariant mass, not relativistic mass. So m in this formula is not the same as energy.

mike232 said:
because the variant mass is mass times 'demensionless velocity' the momentum increases differently than classic,

The momentum increases with velocity differently from the "classic" case (I assume by "classic" you mean "Newtonian") because of the factor ##\gamma##; you don't have to think of "variant mass" (by which I assume you mean "relativistic mass"--it really helps to keep your terminology consistent) at all.

mike232 said:
the classic idea of mass changed but the rest mass, intrinsic energy of matter, doesn't change?

What do you mean by "the classic idea of mass"?

As for rest mass, I'm not sure it is best thought of as "intrinsic energy of matter", because, as I noted above, invariant mass is not the same as energy.

It might help if you gave a specific quote from your book, or a specific example of a scenario you're not sure about.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
83
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
14K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K