Mass of a picture in static equilibrium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of a picture in static equilibrium, requiring a minimum force of 75N at a 45° angle to maintain balance. The coefficient of friction between the wall and the picture frame is 0.30. Participants clarify the correct application of the force of friction equation, emphasizing that the normal force (FN) is derived from the x component of the applied force, specifically FN = 75cos(45). The confusion arises from misapplying mass in the friction equation, which does not include a mass term.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Knowledge of force components in two dimensions
  • Familiarity with friction equations, specifically Ffr = μFN
  • Basic trigonometry, particularly sine and cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of static equilibrium in physics
  • Learn about the application of friction in real-world scenarios
  • Explore vector decomposition in force analysis
  • Review problems involving forces at angles, including trigonometric applications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and static equilibrium, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to forces and friction.

Zack K
Messages
166
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


An artist must push with a minimum of 75N at an angle of 45° to a picture to hold it in equilibrium. The coefficient of friction between the wall and the picture frame is 0.30. What is the mass of the picture?

Homework Equations


ΣF=0
Ffr=μFN
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I set up an equilibrium equation of the y components of all the forces to find the mass. the y components would be, the force of gravity acting on the picture, the force of friction between the picture and the wall, and the y component of the applied force of the artist on the picture. Making the up forces equal to the down forces, you should get, Fappsin(45)=Fg-Ffr. Plugging in values into the known variables you should get, 75sin(45)=m(9.8)-(0.3)m(75sin(45). I factored out m and divided both sides by everything in the brackets to solve for m, obviously though I didn't get the answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is how the equation for the force of friction was used. The correct form is
$$F_{fr}=\mu F_{N}$$
where ##F_{N}## is the normal force between the picture and the wall.
 
NFuller said:
The problem is how the equation for the force of friction was used. The correct form is
$$F_{fr}=\mu F_{N}$$
where ##F_{N}## is the normal force between the picture and the wall.
Yeah sorry, I realized the proper term would be FN, but it wouldn't matter because the normal force would still be 75sin(45) since the x component of 75N would be the normal force acting on the picture.
 
It matters because there is no mass term in the expression for ##F_{N}##.
 
NFuller said:
It matters because there is no mass term in the expression for ##F_{N}##.
I'm confused, isn't the expression for FN=mass x gravity, where gravity is the x component of the applied force?
 
Gravity only operates in the y direction, so it cannot produce a force in the x direction. Here ##F_{N}## is the x component of the force applied by the person pushing the painting against the wall.
 
NFuller said:
Gravity only operates in the y direction, so it cannot produce a force in the x direction. Here ##F_{N}## is the x component of the force applied by the person pushing the painting against the wall.
The x component is going to be still 75sin(45) since it's a 45 degree. I could use 75cos(45) but cos(45) and sin(45) are the same value it doesn't matter which trig function I use. I'm just baffled because everything seems right to me.
 
Your work says
$$F_{N}=m*75\sin(45)$$
There is no mass term. It should be
$$F_{N}=75\cos(45)$$
 
NFuller said:
Your work says
$$F_{N}=m*75\sin(45)$$
There is no mass term. It should be
$$F_{N}=75\cos(45)$$
Oh wow it just hit me, haha I feel so dumb. Since the force has already been given by 75sin(45), a mass term would be ridiculous.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K