Mass on Vertical Spring stretch

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass attached to a vertical spring, exploring the dynamics of spring stretch and energy conservation. The spring has a known spring constant, and the mass is subjected to initial conditions that include both potential and kinetic energy considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of spring stretch and the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy. There are attempts to determine maximum speed based on energy conservation principles, with some questioning the equilibrium position of the spring.

Discussion Status

Participants have explored various calculations and interpretations of energy in the system. Some have provided insights into the equilibrium position's role in the problem, leading to a reevaluation of initial conditions and energy states.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the equilibrium position of the spring when the mass is added, which affects the calculations of potential and kinetic energy. Participants are working within the constraints of the problem as presented, without external references or solutions provided.

pleasehelpme6
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spring with spring constant k = 55 N/m and unstretched length of L0 is attached to the ceiling. A block of mass m = 3 kg is hung gently on the end of the spring.

a) How far does the spring stretch?
----------ANSWER: .53509 m

This is the hard part...

**Now the block is pulled down until the total amount the spring is stretched is twice the amount found in part (a). The block is then pushed upward with an initial speed vi = 2 m/s.

Homework Equations



KE = (1/2) mv^2
KE = (1/2) kx^2
KE + PE = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried simply doubling the distance found in part a to get x=1.07018, and then plugged that into the formula KE = 1/2 kx^2 to get KE = 31.495.

I then used that value in KE = 1/2 mv^2 and solved for v to get v=4.58, which is wrong. I also tried to add 2 to that to get v=6.58, but that's wrong too.

How do I incorporate the Vi = 2 into this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to find?
 
oh oops...
b) What is the maximum speed of the block?
 
pleasehelpme6 said:
oh oops...
b) What is the maximum speed of the block?

ah I see. In that case, initially it is stretched to x=1.07018 m, so how much PE is there? Since it is given an initial velocity as well, there is an initial KE as well.How much is this PE?

The total energy is the sum of the initial PE and KE, at the maximum velocity, v, what should the final PE be?
 
so the initial KE would be 1/2 * mv^2, which would give me 6.
and the initial PE i found to be 31.495 using 1/2 kx^2, with x as 1.07018.

so i set total Energy (37.495) = 1/2 mv^2 to find the max velocity, and i got v=4.9996, which is still incorrect.

hmm..
 
pleasehelpme6 said:
so the initial KE would be 1/2 * mv^2, which would give me 6.
and the initial PE i found to be 31.495 using 1/2 kx^2, with x as 1.07018.

so i set total Energy (37.495) = 1/2 mv^2 to find the max velocity, and i got v=4.9996, which is still incorrect.

hmm..


What is the correct answer?
 
rock.freak667 said:
What is the correct answer?

They don't give it, unfortunately.
 
pleasehelpme6 said:
They don't give it, unfortunately.

I think I made an error as to where the equilibrium position is, if you have the spring, and then hang the mass it goes down a distance δ. If you pull it down another distance δ, the spring is stretched 2δ, but from the equilibrium position with the mass, the extension is just δ (0.53509 m). Try it again.
 
okay, so i got PE initial = 1/2 kx^2 = 7.8738
and KE initial = 1/2 mv^2 = 6
total energy = 13.8738

so at max velocity, 13.8738 = 1/2 mv^2 (all KE)
which would give me 3.041 m/s as max velocity.

That works!
Thanks a ton, I never would have realized the equilibrium position stayed the same.
 
  • #10
pleasehelpme6 said:
That works!
Thanks a ton, I never would have realized the equilibrium position stayed the same.

Yep, I was confusing the equilibrium position of the mass with the position of the spring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
2K