Mass Spring System: PE & KE in SHM Motion

AI Thread Summary
In a simple harmonic motion (SHM) system, potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) exhibit a complementary relationship. In a vertical mass-spring system, both elastic potential energy and gravitational potential energy must be considered, leading to a combined potential energy expression. The total potential energy can be represented as U(x,h) = -mgh + 1/2kx^2, where h and x must be defined consistently. Generally, both types of potential energy can be added since they arise from conservative forces. Understanding the reference position is crucial for accurately defining potential energy in these systems.
abcd8989
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
In a SHM motion, the PE and KE of the system is of a complement relationship. However, in a vertical mass spring system, there seem to be two kinds of PE, elastic PE in the mass spring system as well as the gravitational PE in the Earth mass system. So, what should be the PE of the SHM, and what objects should be considered as a whole system? (As far as I know, we have to define a system when we want to talk about PE, right? ) And is the sum of the elastic pe and the gravitational pe equals the pe in a horizontal mass spring system, and why? I am rather confused with the concepts of pe. Can pe be simply added?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The PE has to be defined with respect to some "reference position" of the system, usually the "rest position" of the mass-spring system.

If you orient the spring vertically, then the mass will naturally dangle a bit lower due to its weight, i.e., the spring will be slightly stretched at "rest."

What happens when you add the PE due to gravity and the PE due to the spring deformation?
 
The system concerning elastic pe is the mass spring and that concerning gravitational pe is mass Earth system. Can they be added?
 
In general they can be added. Each "type" of potential energy arises from a conservative force. Gravitational potential energy follows from -mgh and a elastic potential energy follows from 1/2kx^2. So in the spring mass system, the potential energy becomes U(x,h) = -mgh + 1/2kx^2. In general for a vertical spring system, we define the potential so that h and x are consistent, that is U(x) = -mgx + 1/2kx^2. Likewise, the concept is analogous in a horizontal spring system where we take mgh = 0 for ease of calculation since gravitational potential does not change.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top