Masses on table - Acceleration of Connected Objects

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving problem 2.9 from Kleppner and Kolenkow's 2nd edition, which involves calculating the acceleration of two masses (A and B) on a frictionless table connected by a rope to a hanging mass (C). The derived equations for acceleration are: $$\ddot x_A = \frac{-2 M_C M_B g}{M_C M_B + M_C M_A + 4 M_B M_A}$$, $$\ddot x_B = \frac{-2 M_C M_A g}{M_C M_B + M_C M_A + 4 M_B M_A}$$, and $$\ddot y_C = \frac{(M_C M_A + M_C M_B)g}{M_C M_B + M_C M_A + 4 M_B M_A}$$. Special cases were analyzed, confirming the validity of the equations under various conditions, including when mass C is zero and when all masses are equal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F = ma)
  • Familiarity with basic mechanics concepts, such as tension and acceleration
  • Knowledge of kinematics in one and two dimensions
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations involving multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of tension in pulleys and their applications in mechanics
  • Learn about systems of equations in physics, particularly in dynamics
  • Explore advanced kinematics involving multiple masses and constraints
  • Investigate the effects of friction and mass distribution on acceleration in similar systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in solving complex dynamics problems involving multiple masses and pulleys.

jbunniii
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
3,488
Reaction score
257

Homework Statement


This is problem 2.9 from Kleppner and Kolenkow, 2nd edition. I think I got it right, just want to check since I'm self-studying.

Masses on table
Two masses, ##A## and ##B##, lie on a frictionless table, as shown (see my crudely drawn figure in the thumbnail :-p). They are attached to either end of a light rope of length ##l## which passes around a pulley of negligible mass. The pulley is attached to a rope connected to a hanging mass, ##C##. Find the acceleration of each mass.

Homework Equations


##F = ma##

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I chose the coordinates as follows:
* ##x## points horizontally, away from and perpendicular to the table edge
* ##y## points downward vertically

Define the positions of the objects:
* ##x_A## = horizontal position of mass ##A##
* ##x_B## = horizontal position of mass ##B##
* ##x_p## = horizontal position of movable pulley (the one to the left in the figure)
* ##y_C## = vertical position of mass ##C##
* Note that I didn't draw it very well, but the pulley to the right in the figure is fixed: it is attached rigidly to the table.

I obtained the following constraints due to the rope connections:
$$2 \ddot x_p = \ddot x_A + \ddot x_B$$
$$\ddot x_p + \ddot y_C = 0$$
Combining these, we get
$$-2 \ddot y_C = \ddot x_A + \ddot x_B$$

I then considered the forces on each mass, and on the movable pulley. Masses ##A## and ##B## each have tension ##T_1## pointing to the right (negative ##x##) due to the rope. Thus,
$$T_1 = -M_B \ddot x_B = -M_A \ddot x_A$$
Mass ##C## is acted upon by gravity downward and by tension from the second rope upward. This gives us
$$M_C g - T_2 = M_C \ddot y_C$$
The two tensions are related by the movable pulley: tension ##T_2## pulls to the right, and ##2T_1## pulls to the left. Since the pulley is massless, this gives us ##T_2 = 2T_1##.

Thus we have five equations and five unknowns. I won't go through all the algebra as it's rather ugly but routine. My answer, in case anyone has done this problem and has their solutions available to verify, is:
$$\ddot x_A = \frac{-2 M_C M_B g}{M_C M_B + M_C M_A + 4 M_B M_A}$$
$$\ddot x_B = \frac{M_A}{M_B} \ddot x_A = \frac{-2 M_C M_A g}{M_C M_B + M_C M_A + 4 M_B M_A}$$
$$\ddot y_C = -\frac{1}{2}(\ddot x_A + \ddot x_B) = \frac{(M_C M_A + M_C M_B)g}{M_C M_B + M_C M_A + 4 M_B M_A}$$

I checked several special cases:

Case 1 : ##M_C = 0##. In this case, all the accelerations are zero, as expected since nothing is pulling the system.

Case 2 : ##M_A = 0##. In this case, ##\ddot x_B = 0## (intuitively expected because the "path of least resistance" is to pull massless mass ##A## and leave mass ##B## alone), ##\ddot x_C = (M_C M_B g)/(M_C M_B) = g## (reasonable because ##C## is able to free-fall), and ##\ddot x_A = -2 (M_C M_B g) / (M_C M_B) = -2g## (reasonable since ##C## is free-falling and the movable pulley doubles the motion of ##A##).

Case 3 ##M_A = M_B = M_C##. Here the expressions reduce to ##\ddot x_A = \ddot x_B = -g/3## and ##\ddot x_C = g/3##. I guess this makes sense because gravity's force gets distributed across the three masses equally, so the acceleration of each one is one third of ##g##. I think.

Case 4 ##M_A = M_B = 0##. Here the expressions are invalid because the denominators are zero. But if we step back to the earlier equations, we get: ##T_1 = 0##, ##M_c g = M_C \ddot y_C##, hence ##\ddot y_C = g## as expected since ##C## can free-fall. Also, ##\ddot x_A + \ddot x_B = -2g## and ##\ddot x_A = \ddot x_B##, which forces ##\ddot x_A = \ddot x_B = -g##, as expected since they simply follow ##C## down.
 

Attachments

  • Kleppner2.9.png
    Kleppner2.9.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 1,269
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
:thumbs: It all looks good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
TSny said:
:thumbs: It all looks good to me.
Great, thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K