Why Does Changing Force Direction Affect Acceleration Calculations on a Wedge?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block sliding on a 45-degree wedge that is being pushed with a constant acceleration. Participants are exploring the relationship between the forces acting on the block and its acceleration, particularly how changing the direction of force affects the calculations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the block's acceleration using force equations and vector components. There are questions about the correct application of forces, particularly the normal force and gravitational force, in the context of the block's motion on the wedge.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the vector nature of the problem and the relationship between the wedge's acceleration and the block's motion. There is ongoing exploration of the equations used, with some questioning the assumptions made regarding the direction of forces and accelerations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the definitions of positive and negative directions in the context of forces and accelerations, particularly in relation to the wedge's movement and the block's downward motion.

Buffu
Messages
851
Reaction score
147

Homework Statement


A 45 deg wedge is pushed along a table with a constant accelaration A. A block of mass m slides without friction on the wedge. Find its accelaration.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


path4207.png


##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b##

##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A##

Now equating forces horizontal and vertical forces on the block,

##N\cos \theta - mg = m \ddot y_b##

##N\sin\theta = m \ddot x_b##

Substituting these two in constraint equation,

##\sqrt{2}\times N = mg - mA##

##N = \dfrac{m}{2}(g + A)##

Substituting this back in the equations of forces on the block,

##\ddot x_b = \dfrac{g + A}{2}## and ##\ddot y_b = \dfrac{A - g}{2}##.

This is correct but if I take ##mg -N\cos \theta = m \ddot y_b## I get a wrong answer. For me, since the block is moving downward , ##mg -N\cos \theta## feels more natural and correct than ##-mg +N\cos \theta ##.
Anyway it does not give correct answer it gives ##A = g## which is wrong. I want to know why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buffu said:

Homework Statement


A 45 deg wedge is pushed along a table with a constant accelaration A. A block of mass m slides without friction on the wedge. Find its accelaration.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 203762

##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b##

##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A##

Now equating forces horizontal and vertical forces on the block,

##N\cos \theta - mg = m \ddot y_b##

##N\sin\theta = m \ddot x_b##

Substituting these two in constraint equation,

##\sqrt{2}\times N = mg - mA##

##N = \dfrac{m}{2}(g + A)##

Substituting this back in the equations of forces on the block,

##\ddot x_b = \dfrac{g + A}{2}## and ##\ddot y_b = \dfrac{A - g}{2}##.

This is correct but if I take ##mg -N\cos \theta = m \ddot y_b## I get a wrong answer. For me, since the block is moving downward , ##mg -N\cos \theta## feels more natural and correct than ##-mg +N\cos \theta ##.
Wouldn't the block be moving upward? If the wedge is accelerating to the right, the weight of the block is acting downward, but the vertical component of its acceleration is in the opposite direction -- upward.

Anyway it does not give correct answer it gives ##A = g## which is wrong. I want to know why ?
 
Buffu said:
##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A##
As a vector equation that is true, but not as scalars.
Buffu said:
##\sqrt{2}\times N = mg - mA##
How do you get that? Where did the ##\sqrt{2}## come from?
 
haruspex said:
As a vector equation that is true, but not as scalars.

How do you get that? Where did the ##\sqrt{2}## come from?

##m\ddot x_b + m\ddot y_b = mA##

##N\sin \theta + N\cos \theta - mg = mA##

##\theta = 45^\circ##

##2N/\sqrt{2} = mg + mA \iff N\sqrt{2} = mg + mA##

haruspex said:
As a vector equation that is true, but not as scalars.

Yes I know but I don't know the direction of those vectors.
 
Buffu said:
θ=45∘
Ok, I did not notice you were told that. I only saw the θ in the diagram.
Buffu said:
Yes I know but I don't know the direction of those vectors.
The two accelerations are at right angles. How do you find the magnitude of their vector sum? Hint: Greek gent, name starting with P.
 
haruspex said:
Ok, I did not notice you were told that. I only saw the θ in the diagram.

The two accelerations are at right angles. How do you find the magnitude of their vector sum? Hint: Greek gent, name starting with P.
Pythagoras theorem. ##\vec a = \sqrt{|\ddot x_b |^2 + |\ddot y_b |^2 }## but how is magnitude tell me about direction ?
 
Buffu said:
Pythagoras theorem. ##\vec a = \sqrt{|\ddot x_b |^2 + |\ddot y_b |^2 }## but how is magnitude tell me about direction ?
It doesn't, but it is clearly a correct equation instead of the one you had.
But... you seem to be mixing up the two accelerations. "A" is the given acceleration of the wedge, not the block.

Think about the acceleration of the block relative to the wedge ( X and Y components). What is the component of the normal to the wedge?
 
haruspex said:
It doesn't, but it is clearly a correct equation instead of the one you had.
But... you seem to be mixing up the two accelerations. "A" is the given acceleration of the wedge, not the block.

Think about the acceleration of the block relative to the wedge ( X and Y components). What is the component of the normal to the wedge?

Is ##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A## incorrect ?

Why ? I differentiated ##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b## twice to get it.
 
Buffu said:
Is ##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A## incorrect ?

Why ? I differentiated ##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b## twice to get it.
Then please post that working. I do not understand what happened to the tan θ.
 
  • #10
geogebra-export.png


In the small triangle,

##\tan \beta = \dfrac{h - y_b}{x_b - x_w} \iff (x_b - x_w)\tan \beta = h - y_b \iff (\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w)\tan \beta = -\ddot y_b##

Since ##\beta = \theta = 45^\circ##, ##\tan \beta = 1##.

##\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w = -\ddot y_b##.
 
  • #11
Buffu said:
View attachment 203868

In the small triangle,

##\tan \beta = \dfrac{h - y_b}{x_b - x_w} \iff (x_b - x_w)\tan \beta = h - y_b \iff (\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w)\tan \beta = -\ddot y_b##

Since ##\beta = \theta = 45^\circ##, ##\tan \beta = 1##.

##\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w = -\ddot y_b##.
Oh, ok.
Very sorry, but because I engage in many threads at once I sometimes forget some crucial fact about a problem. In this case I forgot you had already explained θ is 45°. So now I agree with all your equations and can only apologise for all the noise.

Moving on to your original question:
Buffu said:
since the block is moving downward , ##mg -N\cos \theta ## feels more natural and correct
You have defined y as positive upwards, so ##\ddot y## is positive upwards. In the equation ##\Sigma F_y=m\ddot y##, the forces must also be written as positive upwards, so ##N\cos \theta-mg ##.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Oh, ok.
Very sorry, but because I engage in many threads at once I sometimes forget some crucial fact about a problem. In this case I forgot you had already explained θ is 45°. So now I agree with all your equations and can only apologise for all the noise.

Moving on to your original question:

You have defined y as positive upwards, so ##\ddot y## is positive upwards. In the equation ##\Sigma F_y=m\ddot y##, the forces must also be written as positive upwards, so ##N\cos \theta-mg ##.

Oh, right, that was basic. I thought I was missing something very basic. lol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
985
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K