Mastering Definite Integrals: Solving for the Square Root of 1+t^3 from 0 to 3

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the definite integral of the square root of \(1+t^3\) from 0 to 3, which is not expressible in elementary terms and involves elliptic integrals. Participants suggest that traditional methods such as u-substitution and trigonometric substitution are ineffective for this integral. Instead, they recommend using computational tools like MAPLE and Wolfram Alpha, which can handle the complexity and provide outputs involving special functions. The conversation also touches on the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to find the derivative of the integral function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and their properties
  • Familiarity with substitution methods in integration
  • Knowledge of elliptic integrals and special functions
  • Proficiency in using computational tools like MAPLE and Wolfram Alpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Research elliptic integrals and their applications in calculus
  • Learn how to use MAPLE for complex integrals
  • Explore the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and its implications
  • Investigate hypergeometric series and their relation to integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians dealing with complex integrals, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques and computational methods.

limelightdevo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Definite integral, from 0 to 3, of Square root of 1+t^3.

Homework Equations


Tried substitution

The Attempt at a Solution


There should be a simple way to do this but I can't seem to figure it out. Tried the substitution and whatnot but couldn't reach an answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
limelightdevo said:

Homework Statement


Definite integral, from 0 to 3, of Square root of 1+t^3.

Homework Equations


Tried substitution

The Attempt at a Solution


There should be a simple way to do this but I can't seem to figure it out. Tried the substitution and whatnot but couldn't reach an answer.

u-sub won't work because the derivative of the inside is not outside.

trig-sub won't work because it should be t^2.

You might try u^2=1+t^3, though I haven't tried it so no idea.

i would say maybe some extra special clever application of integration by parts, but i wouldn't bet on it.

How did the problem arise, are you sure this is the problem you are supposed to do?

Is it possible that using a computer is expected?
 
MAPLE output for both the definite and indefinite integral looks ridiculous with all kinds of special functions.
 
Same with Wolfram. This integral is not expressable in elementary terms (verified by Risch's algorithm.) It involves the elliptic integral function. If that is acceptable, you can do the problem; but it will still be ridiculously long.
 
NewtonianAlch said:
MAPLE output for both the definite and indefinite integral looks ridiculous with all kinds of special functions.

As much as I have a warm place in my heart for MAPLE (created at UW?), I would just plug it in online at wolfram. It mentions something about the hypergeometric series, and about 7.3.
 
algebrat said:
As much as I have a warm place in my heart for MAPLE (created at UW?), I would just plug it in online at wolfram. It mentions something about the hypergeometric series, and about 7.3.

Haha yea, I use both to be honest, certain things are easier for me to find on MAPLE and in this instance I had it open already.
 
Well, the actual question is different from the question I asked. I didn't want to post the actual one because I partially solved it. Here it is though if there is in fact a different approach. I did find the derivative and was trying to get f^-1(0) by saying f^-1(0) = x so f(x) = 0, but couldn't solved the integral to be able to equal it to 0 to get x.

If f(x) = integral, from 3 to x , of square root of (1+t^3) dt, find (f^-1)'(0).

By the way, I would like to have the simplest and cleanest approach to this to be efficient.

Thanks
 
limelightdevo said:
Well, the actual question is different from the question I asked. I didn't want to post the actual one because I partially solved it. Here it is though if there is in fact a different approach. I did find the derivative and was trying to get f^-1(0) by saying f^-1(0) = x so f(x) = 0, but couldn't solved the integral to be able to equal it to 0 to get x.

If f(x) = integral, from 3 to x , of square root of (1+t^3) dt, find (f^-1)'(0).

By the way, I would like to have the simplest and cleanest approach to this to be efficient.

Thanks

Let y = f(x) = \int_3^x \sqrt{1+t^3}dt

Use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to figure out \frac{dy}{dx} = f'(x)

Now, if y = f(x), then f^{-1}(y) = x and {(f^{-1})}'(y) = \frac{dx}{dy} = \frac{1}{\frac{dy}{dx}} = \frac{1}{f'(x)}.

You're asked to determine {(f^{-1})}'(0), so first figure out what (obvious) value of x would make y zero. The rest is trivial.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K