How to Prove the Integral Property for Definite Integrals

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
doktorwho
Messages
181
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Today i had a test on definite integrals which i failed. The test paper was given to us so we can practise at home and prepare better for the next one. This is the first problem which i need your help in solving::
Test.JPG


Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
As no points were given for a solution of the below integrals without the proof of the integral property above i need to do that first. I had no idea how to start the proof. I figured i need to use some sort of substitution but i fail to see which and why. Could you give me a hint on how to do this? I know i haven't provided any work done by myself but i can't since i can't start. I didn't have a clue calculus was going to be this hard :/.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key here is that ##sin(x)## is symmetric around ##pi/2##. Hence the substitution ##t=pi/2+x## may be of use. You then see that a term in your new expression should disappear.
 
Incand said:
The key here is that ##sin(x)## is symmetric around ##pi/2##. Hence the substitution ##t=pi/2+x## may be of use. You then see that a term in your new expression should disappear.

I think you probably meant something more like ##x=\pi-t##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
The substitution ##x = \pi - t ## does indeed do the trick for proving the proposition before solving the given integral.
 
nuuskur said:
The substitution ##x = \pi - t ## does indeed do the trick for proving the proposition before solving the given integral.
Yeah i did it with the substitution you proposed but how did you arrive at it?