How to Prove the Integral Property for Definite Integrals

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an integral property related to definite integrals, specifically focusing on the symmetry of the sine function. The original poster expresses difficulty in starting the proof and seeks guidance on potential substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the symmetry of the sine function and suggest substitutions, particularly involving transformations like \( t = \pi/2 + x \) and \( x = \pi - t \). The original poster questions the reasoning behind these substitutions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of substitution methods to prove the integral property. Some guidance has been offered regarding the symmetry of the sine function, and participants are actively engaging in clarifying the rationale behind the proposed substitutions.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of prior work due to uncertainty in starting the proof, highlighting the challenges faced in understanding calculus concepts.

doktorwho
Messages
181
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Today i had a test on definite integrals which i failed. The test paper was given to us so we can practise at home and prepare better for the next one. This is the first problem which i need your help in solving::
Test.JPG


Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
As no points were given for a solution of the below integrals without the proof of the integral property above i need to do that first. I had no idea how to start the proof. I figured i need to use some sort of substitution but i fail to see which and why. Could you give me a hint on how to do this? I know i haven't provided any work done by myself but i can't since i can't start. I didn't have a clue calculus was going to be this hard :/.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key here is that ##sin(x)## is symmetric around ##pi/2##. Hence the substitution ##t=pi/2+x## may be of use. You then see that a term in your new expression should disappear.
 
Incand said:
The key here is that ##sin(x)## is symmetric around ##pi/2##. Hence the substitution ##t=pi/2+x## may be of use. You then see that a term in your new expression should disappear.

I think you probably meant something more like ##x=\pi-t##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
The substitution ##x = \pi - t ## does indeed do the trick for proving the proposition before solving the given integral.
 
nuuskur said:
The substitution ##x = \pi - t ## does indeed do the trick for proving the proposition before solving the given integral.
Yeah i did it with the substitution you proposed but how did you arrive at it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K