Mastering Hard Thinking Questions: Solving for a, p, and q with Given Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter I Like Pi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Thinking
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for variables in given equations, specifically focusing on algebraic expressions and trigonometric identities. The original poster presents three distinct problems involving algebraic manipulation and trigonometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different interpretations of the first problem regarding which expression is 40% greater than the other, leading to multiple potential solutions for 'a'.
  • In the second problem, there is a discussion about the polynomial division and the implications of the remainder being zero, with participants suggesting multiplication approaches.
  • For the third problem, participants discuss the application of trigonometric identities and the process of solving the equation involving cosecant and secant functions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the first problem's assumptions, with participants questioning the clarity of the original statement. In the second problem, some guidance has been provided regarding polynomial multiplication, but no consensus on the solution has been reached. The third problem has seen attempts to apply trigonometric identities, with participants sharing their calculations and results, but no definitive conclusion has been drawn yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the first problem regarding which quantity is greater, leading to two distinct values for 'a'. There is also mention of the original equations and the need for clarity in the problem statements to guide the solutions effectively.

I Like Pi
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) given, a + 5 and 2a-1, one is 40% greater than the other one, solve for a.

b) given, 5x[tex]^{4}[/tex] + 4x[tex]^{3}[/tex] + 3x[tex]^{2}[/tex] + Px + Q. When divided by x[tex]^{2}[/tex] - 1, you get a remainder of 0, solve for p and q.

c) given csc(6b + [tex]\frac{pi}{8}[/tex]) = sec(2b - [tex]\frac{pi}{8}[/tex]), solve for b.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



please help, i can't get started on these three at all... :confused:

edit:

c) i know that cscx = 1/sinx and secx = 1/cosx, i then cross multiplied to get [tex]cos(2b-pi/8) = sin(6b+pi/8)...[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Question a) shouldn't be a problem at all.
Any attempt by you ?
 
Quinzio said:
Question a) shouldn't be a problem at all.
Any attempt by you ?

Would it be (a+5) = .4(2a-1) + 2a-1 ? or .4(a+5) + (a+5) = 2a - 1 ?
 
I Like Pi said:
Would it be (a+5) = .4(2a-1) + 2a-1 ? or .4(a+5) + (a+5) = 2a - 1 ?

It's not clear from the text. Choose one and go on, or solve both in sequence.
 
Quinzio said:
It's not clear from the text. Choose one and go on, or solve both in sequence.

well then you get a+5 = 0.8a - 0.4 + 2a -1
a+5 = 2.8a - 1.4
1.8a - 6.4 = 0
1.8a = 6.4
a = 3.55555556 :confused:

or

2a - 1 = .4a + 2 + a + 5
2a - 1 = 1.4a + 7
0.6a - 8 = 0
0.6a = 8
a = 13.3333333

therefore a can be 13.333 or 3.555 ? :confused:
 
yes.
 
Quinzio said:
yes.

thanks :smile: could you help me get started on b) ?

Thanks for your time!
 
b)
Make this multiplication [tex](x^2-1)(Ax^2+Bx+C)[/tex]
 
Quinzio said:
b)
Make this multiplication [tex](x^2-1)(Ax^2+Bx+C)[/tex]

that would give you [tex]ax^4 + bx^3 + (c - a)x^2 - bx - c[/tex]. Is that what you mean?
 
  • #10
I Like Pi said:
that would give you [tex]ax^4 + bx^3 + (c - a)x^2 - bx - c[/tex]. Is that what you mean?

Ok, so now give the solution. It's really easy.
 
  • #11
Quinzio said:
Ok, so now give the solution. It's really easy.

do you use the original equation? so a = 5, b = 4, and c = 3?

but that doesn't work... cause then you get:[tex]5x^4 + 4x^3 + (3 - 5)x^2 - 4x - 3[/tex]
 
  • #12
You realize by yourself there's something wrong. Ok.

You should come alone to the solution. The next step would be giving you the solution.
 
  • #13
Quinzio said:
You realize by yourself there's something wrong. Ok.

You should come alone to the solution. The next step would be giving you the solution.

I don't see what I could possibly do to get the answer :confused: I know that c - a = 3, that's all... but c itself is 3 :confused:
 
  • #14
Why you say "c itself is 3"... ?
Tell me where is written that ?
 
  • #15
Quinzio said:
Why you say "c itself is 3"... ?
Tell me where is written that ?

oh, well i based it on the original... a = 5, b = 4, c = 3...

well, then if that's the case,

[tex]ax^4 + bx^3 + (c - a)x^2 - bx - c[/tex]
[tex]=5x^4 + 4x^3 + (c - 5)x^2 - 4x - c[/tex]
therefore
[tex] c = 8[/tex]?
and therefore:
[tex]P = -4[/tex]
[tex]Q = -8[/tex]

is that what you meant?

Thanks for your help! Means a lot!
 
Last edited:
  • #16
I Like Pi said:
well then you get a+5 = 0.8a - 0.4 + 2a -1
a+5 = 2.8a - 1.4
1.8a - 6.4 = 0
1.8a = 6.4
a = 3.55555556 :confused:

or

2a - 1 = .4a + 2 + a + 5
2a - 1 = 1.4a + 7
0.6a - 8 = 0
0.6a = 8
a = 13.3333333

therefore a can be 13.333 or 3.555 ? :confused:

Not quite...
You solve for the cases where one term is 40% of the other, not 40% greater then the other, as the question asked!

In other words, suppose you have a number (let's say 20) and you want to find the value that is 40% greater.
0.4 * 20 = 8 which is clearly not 40% greater. In fact, it is less!

What would you do to determine the value that is 40% greater than 20?
 
  • #17
zgozvrm said:
Not quite...
You solve for the cases where one term is 40% of the other, not 40% greater then the other, as the question asked!

In other words, suppose you have a number (let's say 20) and you want to find the value that is 40% greater.
0.4 * 20 = 8 which is clearly not 40% greater. In fact, it is less!

What would you do to determine the value that is 40% greater than 20?

Well you would do .4 * 20 + 20, a value 40% greater then 20 is 28?
 
  • #18
Yes, but that simplifies...

0.4 * 20 + 20 = (0.4 + 1) * 20 = 1.4 * 20

Therefore, a number that is 40% larger than x is 1.4 * x
 
  • #19
zgozvrm said:
Not quite...
You solve for the cases where one term is 40% of the other, not 40% greater then the other, as the question asked!

In other words, suppose you have a number (let's say 20) and you want to find the value that is 40% greater.
0.4 * 20 = 8 which is clearly not 40% greater. In fact, it is less!

What would you do to determine the value that is 40% greater than 20?

well at first glance (and i do mean i only "glanced" at it for a split second), i thought the same thing...here are the equations he set up:
I Like Pi said:
(a+5) = .4(2a-1) + 2a-1
.4(a+5) + (a+5) = 2a - 1

look closer at the right-hand side of the first equation. 0.4(2a-1) + 2a-1 = 1.4(2a-1), and the original equation becomes a+5 = 1.4(2a-1), which certainly implies that a+5 is 40% larger than 2a-1. likewise, we can see that the left-hand side of the 2nd equation, 0.4(a+5) + (a+5), equals 1.4(a+5). and so equation 2 becomes 1.4(a+5) = 2a-1, which certainly implies that 2a-1 is 40% greater than a+5.


I Like Pi said:
Well you would do .4 * 20 + 20, a value 40% greater then 20 is 28?

your calculations are correct - you just chose to represent the quantity on one side ofthe equation as 0.4x + x instead of 1.4x.
 
  • #20
Hi I Like Pi! :smile:

(since you like them so much, have a pi: π :wink:)
I Like Pi said:
c) given csc(6b + [tex]\frac{pi}{8}[/tex]) = sec(2b - [tex]\frac{pi}{8}[/tex]), solve for b.

c) i know that cscx = 1/sinx and secx = 1/cosx, i then cross multiplied to get [tex]cos(2b-pi/8) = sin(6b+pi/8)...[/tex]
[tex] <br /> Yes, and now use cosθ = sin(π/2 - θ) to get that in the form sinA = sinB. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" />[/tex]
 
  • #21
My bad. I both misread your equations and miscalculated mine.

You are absolutely right!
 
  • #22
tiny-tim said:
Hi I Like Pi! :smile:

(since you like them so much, have a pi: π :wink:)Yes, and now use cosθ = sin(π/2 - θ) to get that in the form sinA = sinB. :smile:


haha, thank you :smile: !

well i tried that... i used cos instead:
[tex] cos(2b-pi/8) = cos[pi/2-(6b+pi/8)][/tex]
[tex] cos(2b-pi/8) - cos[pi/2-(6b+pi/8)] = 0[/tex]
[tex] cos[(2b-pi/8)-(pi/2-6b-pi/8)] = 0[/tex]
[tex] 8b-pi/2 = cos-inverse(0)[/tex]
[tex] 8b = pi[/tex]
[tex] b = pi/8[/tex]

it doesn't work :frown:

edit: I used geometer's sketchpad to graph the two, and the first point of intersection is (1.76715.., -1)...
 
Last edited:
  • #23
what confuses me about the first question is that i am not so sure that a should have two distinct values. sure, if the text (or wherever the OP got the problem from) literally does not give any more information than what he posted (i.e. doesn't tell you which quantity is 40% greater than the other), then i can see how you would have to solve for a in two different situations, yielding two disticnt values for a (that is, when a+5 is 40% greater than 2a-1, AND when 2a-1 is 40% greater than a+5). either way, the OP has clearly shown us that he knows how to solve for a variable using arithmetic and algebraic manipulations, and has been able to determine a value for a regardless of which quantity is 40% larger than the other.
 
  • #24
94JZA80 said:
well at first glance (and i do mean i only "glanced" at it for a split second), i thought the same thing...here are the equations he set up:


look closer at the right-hand side of the first equation. 0.4(2a-1) + 2a-1 = 1.4(2a-1), and the original equation becomes a+5 = 1.4(2a-1), which certainly implies that a+5 is 40% larger than 2a-1. likewise, we can see that the left-hand side of the 2nd equation, 0.4(a+5) + (a+5), equals 1.4(a+5). and so equation 2 becomes 1.4(a+5) = 2a-1, which certainly implies that 2a-1 is 40% greater than a+5.




your calculations are correct - you just chose to represent the quantity on one side ofthe equation as 0.4x + x instead of 1.4x.

94JZA80 said:
what confuses me about the first question is that i am not so sure that a should have two distinct values. sure, if the text (or wherever the OP got the problem from) literally does not give any more information than what he posted (i.e. doesn't tell you which quantity is 40% greater than the other), then i can see how you would have to solve for a in two different situations, yielding two disticnt values for a (that is, when a+5 is 40% greater than 2a-1, AND when 2a-1 is 40% greater than a+5). either way, the OP has clearly shown us that he knows how to solve for a variable using arithmetic and algebraic manipulations, and has been able to determine a value for a regardless of which quantity is 40% larger than the other.

Thanks very much for your help! and yes, I guess it's just a question that could go both ways because it is written like that. Though I was in a rush to write it down, i hope i didn't write it wrong, but either way, it is pretty straight forward now that i think of it.. :redface:
 
  • #25
I Like Pi said:
oh, well i based it on the original... a = 5, b = 4, c = 3...

well, then if that's the case,

[tex]ax^4 + bx^3 + (c - a)x^2 - bx - c[/tex]
[tex]=5x^4 + 4x^3 + (c - 5)x^2 - 4x - c[/tex]
therefore
[tex] c = 8[/tex]?
and therefore:
[tex]P = -4[/tex]
[tex]Q = -8[/tex]

is that what you meant?

Thanks for your help! Means a lot!

That's correct!

You can also attack this problem by doing the long division:

The dividend is [itex]5x^4 + 4x^3 + 3x^2 + Px + Q[/tex]<br /> The divisor is [itex]x^2 - 1[/tex]<br /> <br /> [itex]x^2[/tex] goes into [itex]5x^4[/tex]<br /> [itex]5x^2[/tex] times.<br /> (That is, [itex]x^2 \times 5x^2 = 5x^4[/tex])<br /> <br /> So multiply the divisor by [itex]5x^2[/tex] and you get [itex](5x^4 - 5x^2)[/tex]<br /> Subtract this from the dividend and you get [itex]4x^3 + 8x^2 + Px + Q[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now, determine how many times [itex]x^2[/tex] goes into [itex]4x^3[/tex]: that would be [itex]4x[/tex] times.<br /> Multiply [itex]4x \times (x^2 - 1) = (4x^3 - 4x)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Subtract this from [itex]4x^3 + 8x^2 + Px + Q[/tex] and you get [itex]8x^2 + (P + 4)x + Q[/tex]<br /> <br /> Continuing...<br /> [itex]8 \times (x^2 - 1) = (8x^2 - 8)[/tex]<br /> [itex]8x^2 + (P + 4)x + Q - (8x^2 - 8) = (P + 4)x + (Q + 8)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Since there is no remainder, (P + 4) and (Q + 8) must both be equal to 0.<br /> <br /> <br /> Quinzio's way is MUCH easier, I just wanted to offer an alternative way.[/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex]
 
  • #26
You're saying cos(A) - cos(B) = 0 if cos(A-B) = 0, which isn't correct.

Start again … draw a graph and look at it …

when does cos(A) = cos(B)?​
 
  • #27
I Like Pi said:
haha, thank you :smile: !

well i tried that... i used cos instead:
[tex] cos(2b-pi/8) = cos[pi/2-(6b+pi/8)][/tex]
[tex] cos(2b-pi/8) - cos[pi/2-(6b+pi/8)] = 0[/tex]
[tex] cos[(2b-pi/8)-(pi/2-6b-pi/8)] = 0[/tex]
[tex] 8b-pi/2 = cos-inverse(0)[/tex]
[tex] 8b = pi[/tex]
[tex] b = pi/8[/tex]

it doesn't work :frown:

i think you're trying to manipulate the equation more than you have to. leave it in the following form:

sin(6b+pi/8) = cos(2b-pi/8)


then, using the identity cosθ = sin(π/2 - θ), you have sin(6b+pi/8) = sin(pi/2-(2b-pi/8)). therefore, 6b+pi/8 = pi/2-2b+pi/8. now solve for b.
 
Last edited:
  • #28
zgozvrm said:
That's correct!

You can also attack this problem by doing the long division:

The dividend is [itex]5x^4 + 4x^3 + 3x^2 + Px + Q[/tex]<br /> The divisor is [itex]x^2 - 1[/tex]<br /> <br /> [itex]x^2[/tex] goes into [itex]5x^4[/tex]<br /> [itex]5x^2[/tex] times.<br /> (That is, [itex]x^2 \times 5x^2 = 5x^4[/tex])<br /> <br /> So multiply the divisor by [itex]5x^2[/tex] and you get [itex](5x^4 - 5x^2)[/tex]<br /> Subtract this from the dividend and you get [itex]4x^3 + 8x^2 + Px + Q[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now, determine how many times [itex]x^2[/tex] goes into [itex]4x^3[/tex]: that would be [itex]4x[/tex] times.<br /> Multiply [itex]4x \times (x^2 - 1) = (4x^3 - 4x)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Subtract this from [itex]4x^3 + 8x^2 + Px + Q[/tex] and you get [itex]8x^2 + (P + 4)x + Q[/tex]<br /> <br /> Continuing...<br /> [itex]8 \times (x^2 - 1) = (8x^2 - 8)[/tex]<br /> [itex]8x^2 + (P + 4)x + Q - (8x^2 - 8) = (P + 4)x + (Q + 8)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Since there is no remainder, (P + 4) and (Q + 8) must both be equal to 0.<br /> <br /> <br /> Quinzio's way is MUCH easier, I just wanted to offer an alternative way.[/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex]
[itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex][itex] <br /> Hey, thanks for the alternative! It makes much sense to me, especially with this, again, thank you for your time! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" /> its amazing the help i get here <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" /><br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="tiny-tim" data-source="post: 2945634" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-title"> tiny-tim said: </div> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> You're saying cos(A) - cos(B) = 0 if cos(A-B) = 0, which isn't correct.<br /> <br /> Start again … draw a graph and look at it …<br /> <br /> <i><div style="margin-left: 20px">when does cos(A) = cos(B)?​</div></i> </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> well, i got that cos(A) = cos(B) (i think that's right)<br /> then you bring that over? So, cos(A)-cos(B) = 0 (am I right here?) and then you group similar terms, so cos(A-B) = 0? why isn't it correct? <br /> <br /> Thanks tim <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" /> i really appreciate your time![/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex]
 
  • #29
94JZA80 said:
i think you're trying to manipulate the equation more than you have to. leave it in the form sin(6b+pi/8) = cos(2b-pi/8). then, sin(6b+pi/8) = sin(pi/2+(2b-pi/8)). if the sine of those quantities are equal, then the quantities themselves are equal. that is, if sin A = sin B, then A = B. likewise, if cos A = cos B, then A = B. therefore, 6b+pi/8 = pi/2+2b-pi/8. now just solve for b.

hey! Thank you so much! It makes a lot of sense! would this be the case any time you have same trig = same trig, you would cancel it out? so if tan(x) = tan(x), x = x and you would solve? Don't you have to do the inverse to get rid of it :confused:

again, i thank you dearly!
 
  • #30
I Like Pi said:
well, i got that cos(A) = cos(B) (i think that's right)
then you bring that over? So, cos(A)-cos(B) = 0 (am I right here?) and then you group similar terms, so cos(A-B) = 0? why isn't it correct?

Well, for a start, if A = B, cos(A-B) = 1, isn't it?

Do what I said … draw a graph, and see when cosA = cosB !

(btw, it isn't only when A = B)

(and now I'm off to bed :zzz: …)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K