MHB Math induction with sigma notation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the formula for the sum of a series using mathematical induction. The induction hypothesis is stated as the sum of \(3i + 1\) from \(i = 1\) to \(n\) equaling \(\frac{n}{2}(3n + 5)\). Participants emphasize the importance of confirming the base case, specifically checking if the formula holds true for \(n = 1\). There is some confusion regarding the induction hypothesis and the base case, highlighting a need for clarity on these concepts. The conversation ultimately seeks to establish the validity of the statement for the initial case.
carameled
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Prove by math induction that

n
sigma 3i + 1 = n/2 (3n + 5)
i = n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you mean is the induction hypothesis \(P_n\):

$$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(3i+1\right)=\frac{n}{2}(3n+5)$$

The first thing we want to do is confirm the base case \(P_1\) is true:

$$\sum_{i=1}^{1}\left(3i+1\right)=\frac{1}{2}(3(1)+5)$$

Is this true?
 
Wow, well I'm just asking for the prove with math induction. I don't understand any of that..
MarkFL said:
I think what you mean is the induction hypothesis \(P_n\):

$$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(3i+1\right)=\frac{n}{2}(3n+5)$$

The first thing we want to do is confirm the base case \(P_1\) is true:

$$\sum_{i=1}^{1}\left(3i+1\right)=\frac{1}{2}(3(1)+5)$$

Is this true?
 
carameled said:
Wow, well I'm just asking for the prove with math induction. I don't understand any of that..

You don't understand what an induction hypothesis is, or demonstrating the truth of the base case? These are fundamental to induction. What method have you been taught?
 
oh I was wrong, it is i = 1 , not i = n. my bad
MarkFL said:
You don't understand what an induction hypothesis is, or demonstrating the truth of the base case? These are fundamental to induction. What method have you been taught?
 
Well, can you answer the question: is the statement true when n= 1?
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...

Similar threads