Math Trouble in Physics Land: Logarithms

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical manipulation of logarithmic expressions in the context of a physics problem related to spring displacement and force in a mass-spring-damper system. Participants explore the feasibility of isolating a variable 'z' from logarithmic terms and the implications for modeling physical systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to isolate 'z' from a logarithmic expression to simplify calculations related to spring displacement.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of "pulling z out of the logarithm," suggesting that it may not be possible to solve it algebraically.
  • A different participant proposes that while 'z' cannot be completely removed, it can be expressed in terms of other variables using a derived equation.
  • Some participants challenge the clarity and correctness of mathematical expressions presented, leading to confusion about notation and definitions.
  • There are discussions about the interpretation of strain equations and how they relate to the physical model being described.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the ability to isolate 'z' from the logarithmic expressions. There are competing views on the validity of the mathematical manipulations and interpretations of the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in clarity regarding notation and the definitions of variables, which contribute to misunderstandings. The discussion reflects varying levels of mathematical experience among participants.

Chrono G. Xay
Messages
91
Reaction score
3
Working on a personal music project, I would like to pull 'z' out of the logarithm below if I can help it, but am having trouble:

image.jpg


It's a portion taken from this:

image.jpg


Which evolved from...

image.jpg


image.jpg


image.jpg


image.jpg


However, this is only the mathematical modeling of the object. The actual *physics* aspect is much more simple, and has already been worked out from a linear model I developed before it. The above quadratic model is more realistic.

Anyway, my hope is that if I can pull 'z' out of the logarithms I can pull it all the way out of the second integral (theta). If not- I'll just have to see what I can do. (I don't have my spiral with me to check.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "pull z out of the logarithm"?
You don't have an equation to solve for z.

But even if you have, it is quite likely that there is no way to solve it algebraically.
 
Factor it out.
 
You cannot factor the z from that expression - it is impossible to remove it from the logarithmic expressions.
 
Ok. I expected that was the case, but not having that much 'collegiate experience' in math I wanted to ask, anyway. Thank you.
 
You can't remove ##z## completely from the logarithm expression, but you can solve for it:
##S = \ln\Big(\sqrt{\frac{z^2+(2L_n)^2}{2L_n}}+2\sqrt{L_n}\Big)-\ln\Big(\sqrt{\frac{z^2+(2L_n)^2}{L_n}}-2\sqrt{L_n}\Big)\\
=2\ln(\sqrt{z^2+(2L_n)^2}+2L_n)-2\ln(z)=2\ln\Big(\sqrt{1+(\frac{2L_n}{z})^2}+\frac{2L_n}{z}\Big)=2\operatorname{arsinh}\Big(\frac{2L_n}{z}\Big)\\
\Rightarrow z=\frac{2L_n}{\sinh(S)}.##​
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu
suremarc said:
##\Rightarrow z=\frac{2L_n}{\sinh(S)}.##
My bad--that should be ##z=\frac{2L_n}{\sinh(\frac{S}{2})}.##
 
That solution does nothing for the original question.
 
The reason I was hoping I'd be able to factor 'z' to where it occurred only once in the equation and was multiplied by everything else (held inside a likely large parentheses) was so I could use it as the spring displacement in the equation for spring force, where, obviously, everything else was the spring constant (of a circular membrane) in a mass-spring-damper system. Then again, how does one go about mathematically describing such a system when the mass is, itself, the spring?
 
  • #10
You have some very strange things in your posts. In your fifth image you have
\frac{\Delta L}{L}= \frac{L- L}{L}= \frac{L}{L}- 1= \frac{L_1- L_2}{L}- 1
None of that makes any sense at all!
 
  • #11
ΔL / L_0 = ( L_f - L_0 ) / L0 = ( L_f / L_0 ) - ( L_0 / L_0 ) = ( L_f / L_0 ) - 1

What's strange about that? It's the equation for strain, ε.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Okay- I think I see the problem here. I expressed 'L_0' as a lowercase 'l' for the sake of minimizing the use of subscripts, and as such I made sure to make the curve at the bottom of the 'l' pronounced.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
As for l_1 and l_2, I was adding two distinct initial chord segments (not to be confused with chord lengths, as c=2*sqrt(r^2-d^2) can be expanded to equal the sum of two line segments, sqrt(r^2-d^2)+sqrt(r^2-d^2) ). L_1 and L_2 are the initial segments, being deformed and, thus, stretched to a final length.
 
  • #14
HallsofIvy said:
You have some very strange things in your posts. In your fifth image you have
\frac{\Delta L}{L}= \frac{L- L}{L}= \frac{L}{L}- 1= \frac{L_1- L_2}{L}- 1
None of that makes any sense at all!
##L_n, l_n## and##\ ln## present an inscrutable mix in modified-cursive handwritten font!

I see it as ##\frac{\Delta L}{l} = \frac{L - l}l##
 
  • #15
I feel confused by your reply... I never used "l_n" or "L_n"... I used l_1 and l_2, and L_1 and L_2... natural log was always written as 'ln(x)'...

L ( AKA "L_f" ) = L_1 + L_2
l ( AKA "L_0" ) = l_1 + l_2
 
  • #16
Looking back still farther, I think I see what you were referring to (which I interpreted to be "z * sqrt( x / l_n )" ). Yeah, I saw how that could be perceived as ambiguous. I still wanted to try to minimize subscripts to make it more visually intuitive, especially considering the type of system being described.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K