Mathematica - how to simplify an output formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on simplifying complex output formulas in Mathematica. User Safinaz reports difficulties using the built-in functions //Simplify and //FullSimplify, noting that the latter is too slow and ineffective for their specific formula. The provided formula includes multiple variables such as GG, v45, MSR, t, and s, which are intended to remain as unknowns. Participants are encouraged to share alternative methods or tools for achieving simplification in Mathematica.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Mathematica syntax and functions
  • Understanding of algebraic expressions and simplification techniques
  • Knowledge of variable handling in symbolic computation
  • Experience with performance considerations in computational software
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced Mathematica functions such as //Reduce for constraint-based simplification
  • Investigate the use of assumptions in Mathematica to enhance simplification processes
  • Learn about optimization techniques for improving the performance of Mathematica computations
  • Review community resources or forums for additional tips on simplifying complex expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematica users, mathematicians, and researchers dealing with complex algebraic expressions who seek efficient methods for simplification and performance optimization in their computations.

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Mathematica -- how to simplify an output formula

Hi all,

Is there any more options to simplify an out put Mathematica formula. I used //Simplify but the expression still
complicated and //FullSimplify too slow and didn't work.

Bests,
Safinaz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please provide your code.
 
Hi,
Here is that:1/s^2 266.428 GG^4 (-1. MSR^4 + s (1.69 - 1. t) -
1. (-1.69 + t) (-1.69 + t) +
MSR^2 (-3.38 + 2. t)) + (-8.5683 MSR^8 +
s^3 (3.62011 - 2.14208 t) +
MSR^6 (74.2122 + 8.5683 s + 24.6339 t) +
s^2 (-71.8863 - 5.43016 t - 5.89071 t^2) -
3.74863 (61.6102 - 3.38 t + t^2) (2.8561 - 3.38 t + t^2) -
7.49726 s (-1.69 + t) (26.5209 - 2.43421*10^-16 t + t^2) +
MSR^4 (-2.14208 s^2 + s (-66.0669 - 29.4535 t) -
27.3115 (0.639919 + t) (4.46322 + t)) +
MSR^2 (s^2 (7.24021 + 12.8525 t) +
14.9945 (-1.69 + t) (19.1767 + 4.34571 t + t^2) +
s (177.421 + 86.8826 t + 23.5628 t^2)))/((1.69 -
1. t)^2 (1.69 + 2. MSR^2 - 1. s -
1. t)^2 v45^4) + (GG^2 (-1383.72 + 71.6685 MSR^6 +
MSR^4 (-242.24 - 35.8343 s - 143.337 t) +
s^2 (-60.5599 - 35.8343 t) + 1637.54 t - 484.479 t^2 -
35.8343 s (-1.69 + t) (11.83 + t) +
MSR^2 (71.6685 (-1.69 + t) (11.83 + t) +
s (242.24 + 143.337 t))))/(s (1.69 - 1. t) (-1.69 -
2. MSR^2 + s + t) v45^2)

Where GG, v45, MSR,t , s are free varibles I 'd like to leave them as unknowns.

Safinaz
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K