Mathematical Explanation of Faraday Cage Theory - Reflected/Transmitted Waves

AI Thread Summary
A mathematical explanation of Faraday cage theory involves analyzing the relationship between hole size and the behavior of reflected and transmitted electromagnetic waves. The cage can be modeled as an infinite sheet with periodic holes, allowing for the calculation of transmission and reflection characteristics through methods like Floquet modes. Alternatively, the holes can be treated as rectangular waveguides to estimate power loss during transmission, though this approach neglects inter-hole coupling. A simplified view suggests that if the hole sizes are electrically small, the mesh behaves like a perfect electric conductor (PEC) sheet, with induced currents that depend on the phase shifts between them. Ultimately, the size of the holes is determined by the minimum phase shift permissible before reflection becomes significant.
MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71
I was looking for a mathematical explanation of a Faraday cage. In particular I was seeking something that relates hole size to the reflected and transmitted waves, using electromagnetic theory. This might also relate to a wire grid polarizer. Would anyone be able to help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several ways of doing it, depending on how much you want to simplify and approximate.

For example, you can treat the cage as an infinite sheet with periodic holes. There are many methods, some analytic but generally more computational, that can solve for an infinite periodic mesh and find the Floquet modes that describe the transmission and reflection characteristics (EDIT: Remembered the word!).

You could also treat the holes as rectangular waveguides of a very small thickness. You could find the evanescent mode at your frequency for your given hole size and then approximate the power loss in the transmission. This would ignore the coupling between the holes that the above method takes into account. The loss of the evanescent mode depends upon the size of the hole.

Then there is the hand-wavy explanation. The gridded mesh, if the size of the holes are electrically small, behaves like a solid PEC sheet. This is realized from the fact that for an infinite PEC sheet, the induced currents from a plane wave are constant magnitude, lie in the same direction, and only differ in phase. A rectangular mesh therefore can support a superposition of currents that run in normal directions, so by decomposing any incident wave into the superposition of two plane waves we can see how the induced currents can be supported. The rule for the holes comes about because the ideal PEC sheet has a continuous distribution of currents whereas the mesh has a discrete stepping in the phase shift between current sources. So the hole size is dictated by the minimum phase shift that we can allow before we consider the reflection of the plane wave to be unsupportable.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top