Mathematical Induction: Chapter 1, Example 4 from WiM? by Courant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical induction problem presented in Courant and Robbins' "What is Mathematics?" The problem requires proving a product involving terms of the form (1+q^k) for k being powers of 2, equating it to a fraction involving powers of q.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the base case and then show the inductive step, but encounters difficulties in manipulating the expressions correctly. Some participants question the clarity of the notation used and suggest focusing on the numerator of the expression. Others propose checking previous workings and exploring different approaches to the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and nudges rather than direct solutions. There is an acknowledgment of confusion regarding the manipulation of terms, and some guidance has been offered to revisit foundational concepts such as the law of indices.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster is new to the topic, which may contribute to the challenges faced in understanding the problem. There is also a mention of difficulties in representing mathematical expressions clearly in the forum format.

DarrenM
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
This is not homework, per se, but I have recently started reading Courant and Robbins' What is Mathematics?

Homework Statement


Prove by mathematical induction.
(1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2n) = (1-q2n+1) / (1-q)

Homework Equations


Only the problem itself.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the method the book briefly introduced, I first established that A1 was true.

A1 = (1+q)(1+q2) = 1+q+q2+q3

Furthermore,

(1-q21+1) / (1-q) = (1-q4) / (1-q) = (1-q2)(1+q2) / (1-q) = (1+q)(1+q2)

Next, I attempted to show that Ar+1 follows from Ar, but this is where I ran into trouble.

1. (1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2r) = (1-q2r+1) / (1-q)

2. (1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2r)(1+q2r+1) = {(1-q2r+1) / (1-q)}(1+q2r+1)

This is the point at which I hit a wall. I feel like it's something absurdly simple, but I've been stuck on this for hours; I think it's the variable raised to a power raised to a binomial power that is throwing me for a loop.

I tried simply multiplying (1-q2r+1) and (1+q2r+1); that gives me another binomial that is the difference of two squares:

{(1-(q2r+1)(q2r+1)} / (1-q)

But again, stumped. I believe that if I multiply those two terms together I get (1-q2r+1+2r+1) / (1-q). If that's the case, this is the point at which I have completely lost it. However, I am not confident that I'm doing that properly.

Just to see if I could work backwards, I took a look at what I think Ar+1 would look like:

Ar+1 = (1-q2r+2) / (1-q)

Any hints on where/what I'm doing wrong would be very much appreciated.

P.S. - All of this is very new to me, so I apologize if it's not quite as clear or as polished as it should be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DarrenM said:
2. (1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2r)(1+q2r+1) = {(1-q2r+1) / (1-q)}(1+q2r+1)

I don't understand your parenthesis.
well..
[tex]A_{r+1}=(1+q^{2^{r+1}})\frac{1-q^{2^{r+1}}}{1-q}[/tex]
Just by focusing on the numerator,
[tex](1+q^{2^{r+1}})(1-q^{2^{r+1}})[/tex]
Gives us
[tex]1-q^{2^{r+1}\times2}[/tex]I'll leave the rest to you.
Whenever you are stuck, check your previous workings , then try other approach to that question.
 
Sorry about the parenthesis and brackets, I'm not sure how to clearly represent fractions with the forum-code.

And I'm afraid that 1-q2r+1x2 takes me right back to where I was stuck. Any additional hint to nudge me in the right direction? :)
 
DarrenM said:
Sorry about the parenthesis and brackets, I'm not sure how to clearly represent fractions with the forum-code.

And I'm afraid that 1-q2r+1x2 takes me right back to where I was stuck. Any additional hint to nudge me in the right direction? :)

law of indices:

[tex]a^b \times a^c[/tex]=[tex]a^{b+c}[/tex]

Now:
[tex]2^{r+1} \times 2^{1}[/tex] = ?
 
Last edited:
Aaaaargh.

It's not like I didn't just do that this morning on a previous problem. Nor is it like I wasn't staring at 1-q2(2r+1) while trying to solve this.

2r+1 x 21 = 2r+1+1 = 2r+2

Thanks very much for the help.
 
Welcome! Never ever abandon your law of indices agn (=
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K