Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Mathematical Induction on rationals

  1. Mar 22, 2010 #1
    Hi
    I'm a high school student. I gave a proof for the following theorem, but I was told by some professors that this is trivial and using natural induction twice for the rationals will do the same thing. What do you think? Is it just redundant?

    Theorem:


    Let P(r) be a statement about r, then if :
    1) P(1) is true and,
    2) [tex]\forall[/tex] m,n [tex]\in[/tex] [tex]N[/tex] , m[tex]\geq[/tex]n ; P([tex]\frac{m}{n}[/tex])[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] P([tex]\frac{m+1}{n}[/tex])

    Then [tex]\forall[/tex] r[tex]\in[/tex] Q, r[tex]\geq[/tex]1 ; P(r).



    (PS: I apologize for my (probable) mistakes, because I'm neither an English speaker nor familiar with Latex.)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 22, 2010 #2

    CRGreathouse

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's not quite true as stated; take P(r) = true if r > 0 and false otherwise. But the basic idea is right.

    If you were a college student, I would agree that this is a trivial result by double induction. But as a high-school student I actually think it's pretty good. Most wouldn't think to extend induction to the rationals at all.
     
  4. Mar 22, 2010 #3
    I can't get why it's not true. Did you notice r[tex]\geq[/tex]1 in the last sentence?

    And thank you for the reply.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Mathematical Induction on rationals
  1. Rational Numbers (Replies: 2)

  2. Rational Operations (Replies: 4)

Loading...