Mathematical Induction with Sigma notation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the formula for the sum of cubes using mathematical induction. The initial base case check for n=1 contained an error in the denominator, which was mistakenly set to 2 instead of 4, leading to an incorrect conclusion. The correct base case shows that 1 equals 1, confirming the formula holds for n=1. For the induction step, it is suggested to add (k+1)^3 to both sides of the equation, leading to a successful factorization that confirms the formula for n=k+1. The participants clarify the steps needed to complete the proof, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying the induction hypothesis.
NotChelsea
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Prove by mathematical induction that

n
sigma r^3 = n^2(n+1)^2/4
r = 1

so far I have

1
sigma r^3 = 1^2(1+1)^2/2
r=1

1 = 1(4)/2

1 = 4/2

1 = 2

I'm not sure what to do after this for the k+1 case.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

Your induction hypothesis $P_n$ is:

$$\sum_{r=1}^{n}\left(r^3\right)=\frac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4}$$

As your induction step, I would suggest adding $$(n+1)^3$$ to both sides...

edit: I just noticed you have an error in your check of the base case $P_1$...can you spot it?
 
ummmm is it because of the "1 = 2"?
 
The "1=2" happened because you divided by 2 instead of 4.
 
NotChelsea said:
Prove by mathematical induction that

n
sigma r^3 = n^2(n+1)^2/4
r = 1

so far I have

1
sigma r^3 = 1^2(1+1)^2/2
r=1
As Opalg pointed out, in your original formula you have "/4" but have accidently changed that to "/2".

1 = 1(4)/2

1 = 4/2

1 = 2
which is NOT true! But with "4" in the denominator as in the original formula this becomes 1= 1(4)/4 which is true.

I'm not sure what to do after this for the k+1 case.
The reason so many induction problems involve sums is that then the "k+1" case is just the "k" case plus the next term!

With n= k+ 1 you have
[math]\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^3= \sum_{r= 1}^k r^3+ (k+1)^3[/math]
[math]= k^2(k+1)^2/4+ (k+1)^3[/math].

Factor [math](k+1)^2[/math] out of that to get
[math]= (k+1)^2(k^2/4+ k+ 1)= (k+1)^2(k^2+ 4k+ 4)/4[/math]

And now you just have to observe that [math]k^2+ 4k+ 4= (k+ 2)^2= ((k+1)+1)^2[/math] so that [math](k+1)^2(k^2+ 4k+ 4)/4= (k+1)^2((k+1)+1)^2/4[/math]
really is "[math]n^2(n+1)^2/4[/math]" with n= k+ 1.
 
ohhhh I see it now. Thank you so much!
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...

Similar threads