Mathematical methods of Physics, ODE

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation of the form xy'' - 2xy' + (K - 3x)y = 0, focusing on determining the values of K for which the equation has bounded solutions in the interval (0, ∞). The subject area is ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and methods for solving them, particularly the Frobenius method.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the behavior of the differential equation as x approaches infinity and discuss the implications of including certain exponential terms in their calculations. They consider the use of the Frobenius method and express concerns about the boundedness of solutions. There are attempts to derive recurrence relations and identify conditions on K that lead to bounded solutions.

Discussion Status

Participants have made progress in deriving recurrence relations and identifying forms for K that may lead to bounded solutions. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between coefficients in the series expansion and the implications of different values of K. Some participants have noted potential sign errors in their calculations, leading to further clarification and adjustments in their approaches.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific constraints regarding the boundedness of solutions and the requirement for series to terminate, which influences the values of K being considered. Participants also express a desire to derive general terms for coefficients in their series expansions, indicating a focus on deeper understanding rather than just finding a solution.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


For what values of K does the DE [itex]xy''-2xy'+(K-3x)y=0[/itex] (1) has a bounded solution in [itex](0, \infty)[/itex]?

Homework Equations


Not so sure, Frobenius method maybe.

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I check what happens when x tends to infinity. I see that the DE behaves like [itex]\phi ''-2 \phi '-3 \phi =0[/itex]. Where [itex]\phi (x)=c_1e^{3x}+c_2e^{-x}[/itex]. I checked out and this indeed satisfies the DE (2).
I propose a solution to (1) of the form [itex]y(x)=f(x) \phi (x)[/itex]. So I calculated y' and y'' and replaced all this into the DE (1) and after a lot of algebra I reached that the DE (1) is equivalent to the DE [itex]f''(x)+4f'(x)+f(x) \left ( \frac{Kc_1e^{3x}}{x} \right ) \cdot \left ( \frac{1}{c_1e^{3x}+c_2e^{-x}} \right )=0[/itex] (3) where these [itex]c_1[/itex] and [itex]c_2[/itex] differs from the ones given in the expression for [itex]\phi (x)[/itex] but this doesn't matter, they are constants. Now I must say I'm not really eager to use Frobenius's method on the DE (3). Mainly due to the denominator. I don't really know how to proceed... any help will be appreciated as usual.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure if it will help, but surely you wouldn't want to include the e3x in your calculations because it isn't bounded. I would try just the e-x part, but no guarantees; I haven't tried it myself.
 
LCKurtz said:
Not sure if it will help, but surely you wouldn't want to include the e3x in your calculations because it isn't bounded. I would try just the e-x part, but no guarantees; I haven't tried it myself.
Whoops, you're absolutely right! I forgot about this. :redface:
 
I progressed on the problem.
I skip the algebra, and I must solve [itex]f''(x)-4f'(x)+\frac{K}{x}f(x)=0[/itex]. I use Frobenius's method on it and this gave me the indicial equation s=0 (that I discard later) and s=1.
I reach the recurrence relation [itex]a_{n+1}=\frac{-a_n [4(n+s)+K]}{(n+2)(n+1)}[/itex].
The values of K they ask for is when [itex]a_{n+1}=0[/itex] and [itex]a_n \neq 0[/itex]. So [itex]K=-4n-4[/itex] with n going from 0 to infinity. (This is, I hope, the answer to the problem).
However say I want to find the general terms [itex]a_n[/itex] in [itex]\sum _{n=0}^{\infty} a_nx^{n+1}[/itex].
I'm currently trying to find a pattern, by setting [itex]a_0=1[/itex] between the [itex]a_n[/itex]'s but I'm not getting successful in it.
[itex]a_0=1[/itex], [itex]a_1=-\frac{4+K}{2}[/itex], [itex]a_2=\left ( \frac{4+K}{2} \right )\left ( \frac{8+K}{3\cdot 2} \right )[/itex], [itex]a_3=-\frac{(4+K)}{2} \left ( \frac{8+K}{3\cdot 2} \right ) \left ( \frac{12+K}{4\cdot 3} \right )[/itex].

So far I realize that [itex]a_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{n!(n+1)!}[/itex] multiplied by something that I'm not sure (and don't find yet). Maybe something similar to [itex]\frac{(4n+K)!}{(4n+K-1)(4n+K-2)(4n+K-3)}[/itex]. Can someone help me on this task?
 
Did you perhaps make a sign error? I find the recursion relation to be
[tex]a_{n+1} = -\frac{K-4(n+1)}{(n+1)(n+2)} a_n.[/tex]
 
vela said:
Did you perhaps make a sign error? I find the recursion relation to be
[tex]a_{n+1} = -\frac{K-4(n+1)}{(n+1)(n+2)} a_n.[/tex]

Yes I think I did, though now I get a different answer from ours.
From [itex]f''(x)-4f'(x)+\frac{K}{x}f(x)=0[/itex] and [itex]f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n x^{n+s}[/itex], I reach that it's equivalent to [itex]\sum_{n=-1}^{\infty}a_{n+1}(n+s)(n+s+1) x^{n+s-2}-4\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n(n+s) x^{n+s-1}-K \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n x^{n+s-1}=0[/itex]
[itex]\Rightarrow a_0s(s-1)x^{s-2}+\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n x^{n+s-1} [-4(n+s)-K]+a_{n+1}(n+s+1)(n+s)x^{n+s-1}=0[/itex].
So [itex]-a_n [4(n+s)+K]+a_{n+1}(n+s+1)(n+s)=0\Rightarrow a_{n+1}=\frac{a_n[4(n+s)+K]}{(n+s+1)(n+s)}[/itex].

Mod note: fixed LaTeX
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fluidistic said:
Yes I think I did, though now I get a different answer from ours.
From [itex]f''(x)-4f'(x)+\frac{K}{x}f(x)=0[/itex] and [itex]f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n x^{n+s}[/itex], I reach that it's equivalent to [tex]\sum_{n=-1}^{\infty}a_{n+1}(n+s)(n+s+1) x^{n+s-2}-4\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n(n+s) x^{n+s-1}-K \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n x^{n+s-1}=0[/tex]
You changed the sign on the K term, so you should get
[tex]a_0s(s-1)x^{s-2}+\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n x^{n+s-1} [K-4(n+s)]+a_{n+1}(n+s+1)(n+s)x^{n+s-1}=0.[/tex]Then you made one more sign error which got rid of the alternating sign.
 
You are right, I made a typo when I copied the DE when I turned the page of my draft for the sign of K. I now reach your result.
I'm trying to find a pattern by calculating the first terms, assuming [itex]a_0=1[/itex].
[itex]a_1=-\frac{(K-4)}{2}, a_2=\frac{(K-4)(K-8)}{2\cdot 3\cdot 2}[/itex], etc.
My attempt is [itex]a_n=\frac{(-1)^n(K-4)(K-8)...(K-4n)}{n!(n+1)!}[/itex] but this doesn't work for [itex]a_0[/itex] since I get K instead of 1.
 
If you require that the series terminates, you know K has the form K=4m where m=1, 2, 3, ...
 
  • #10
vela said:
If you require that the series terminates, you know K has the form K=4m where m=1, 2, 3, ...

Yes indeed. [itex]K-4(n+1)=0 \Rightarrow k=4(n+1)[/itex] with n=0, 1, etc. which is equivalent to K=4m for m=1, 2, etc.
I was just trying to do more than what they asked me. I wanted to express [itex]a_n[/itex] in terms of n only rather than [itex]a_{n+1}[/itex] in terms of [itex]a_n[/itex]. I don't think it really matters anyway, but since I've a weakness in doing it I wanted to eradicate it. :smile:
 
  • #11
I didn't do this calculation out carefully yesterday so I may have made a mistake, but I think you can use the fact that K=4m to express an in terms of n and m.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K