Matrix Determinants Homework: Finding the Answer

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of a polynomial related to matrix determinants. Participants are examining different approaches to factor the expression and clarify the relationship between roots and factors.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for factoring a quadratic polynomial, including the use of the quadratic formula and the factor theorem. There are questions about the correctness of the factors derived from the roots and the implications of using computational tools like Wolfram Alpha.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct factorization process, while others are clarifying misunderstandings regarding roots versus factors. There is an acknowledgment of confusion around the expressions involved, but no consensus has been reached on a single method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's approach may have led to complications due to reliance on computational tools, and there is a discussion about the importance of understanding the relationship between roots and factors in polynomial expressions.

DiamondV
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


abe7cd6b9a.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


6407b645fb.jpg


The answer in the solutions is given as : (2x+1)(x-1)(1-x), they did their matrix differently so that's how they got that answer. I used wolfram alpha to factorise my quadratic on the last line and it gave me alternative forms which had 2 factors from the solutions provided to me, so my answer is correct. My issue is, how do I sort of convert my answer that I got into the ones that the solutions had as a lot of our exams are MCQ and I probably wouldn't have realized that they were the same answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mistake was using Wolfram for such a simple problem. You have ##(-2x^2+x+1)## that you want to factor. Standard would be to factor out the leading minus sign giving ##-(2x^2-x-1)## which you should easily be able to factor yourself into ##-(2x+1)(x-1)##.
 
LCKurtz said:
Your mistake was using Wolfram for such a simple problem. You have ##(-2x^2+x+1)## that you want to factor. Standard would be to factor out the leading minus sign giving ##-(2x^2-x-1)## which you should easily be able to factor yourself into ##-(2x+1)(x-1)##.

I never used wolfram while i was doing it. I used the x = -b formula to get the roots which gave me x=-1/2 and x=1
 
I'm not familiar with the "x=-b" formula for getting the roots. But after you said that I noticed that your two answers are in fact not the same. You don't want the roots, you want the factors, and they aren't the same. If you multiply out the last three factors in your image, you don't get the expression you have.
 
LCKurtz said:
I'm not familiar with the "x=-b" formula for getting the roots.

I think the OP is referring to the Quadratic formula here.

##x_{1,2} = \frac{-b±\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}##
 
I used that formula above, to get the roots and then i used the factor theorem to get the facctors.
 
But your last expression is not the correct factorization of your original polynomial. It is off by a factor of 2. The problem is$$
-2x^2+x+1 = -(2x^2-x-1) = -(2x+1)(x-1)\ne (x-1)(x+\frac 1 2)$$You have to use the factor theorem correctly. Note that both ##2x+1## and ##x+\frac 1 2## have a root of ##-\frac 1 2##. All this confusion would have been avoided if you had just factored the expression in the first place instead of looking for roots.
 
The roots are correct, but if you just look at the roots you miss the prefactor of 2.

2x and x both have 0 as root, but they are not the same. Similar with (x+1/2) and (2x+1).
Just multiply your factors together again and see if you get the right result.
 
Yeah. I've gotten the right answer now, I made it complicated for no reason.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K