Matrix Formalism of Differential Geometry

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the representation of differential geometry using matrix formalism, particularly in relation to tensors. Participants are exploring how tensors, including the metric tensor, can be expressed as matrices and the implications of such representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks resources for writing differential geometry in matrix format.
  • Another participant asks if the focus is on representing tensors as matrices.
  • A participant confirms that the metric tensor can be represented as a 4x4 Hermitian matrix.
  • It is noted that symmetric 2-tensors correspond to symmetric matrices, while antisymmetric 2-tensors correspond to antisymmetric matrices, with examples provided.
  • A mention of the matrix form of pushforwards and pullbacks is made, suggesting that this is a common topic in relevant texts.
  • A link to a related discussion is shared, although its relevance is not elaborated upon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the representation of tensors as matrices, but the discussion remains open regarding the nuances and implications of these representations, with no consensus on specific subtleties.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions about the types of tensors being discussed and the specific contexts in which these matrix representations apply.

thehangedman
Messages
68
Reaction score
2
I would like to explore writing differential geometry in matrix format and was wondering if any of the experts here knows a good resource for that? I have tried Google and can't find anything definitive.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about representing tensors as matrices?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Are you talking about representing tensors as matrices?

Yes. The metric tensor would become a 4x4 hermitian matrix.
 
Well, symmetric 2-tensors are represented by symmetric matrices, like the metric. Antisymmetric 2-tensors are represented by antisymmetric matrices, like the Maxwelltensor. Are there any magical things going on here?

The matrixform of pushforwards and pullbacks also are quite frequently noted in texts. I must say that I can't think of any subtleties, but maybe this topic,

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=353536

helps a little :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K