Matrix Invertibility: RREF to Identity

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathwizarddud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A matrix A is invertible if and only if its reduced row echelon form (RREF) is the identity matrix. The proof involves understanding that row operations correspond to matrix algebra transformations. If the RREF of matrix A contains a row of zeros, this indicates that the determinant is zero, confirming that A is not invertible. This discussion highlights the direct relationship between the RREF and the invertibility of matrices in linear algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically matrix operations
  • Familiarity with reduced row echelon form (RREF)
  • Knowledge of determinants and their implications for matrix invertibility
  • Experience with row operations on matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants and their role in matrix invertibility
  • Learn about different methods for row-reducing matrices to RREF
  • Explore the implications of row operations in linear transformations
  • Investigate the relationship between RREF and the rank of a matrix
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators teaching matrix theory and its applications.

mathwizarddud
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Prove that a matrix A is invertible if and only if its reduced row echelon row is the identity matrix.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Even though I was never taught linear algebra fully, to do this problem I would consider what would make the matrix A invertible and what would it mean if the RRE form wasn't the identity matrix.

But I am not sure if that would be a valid proof.
 


This isn't too hard to prove. You can start by asking yourself what a row operation on a matrix translates to in matrix algebra. And what do the matrices corresponding to the row-operations amount to when they row-reduce A to I?

As for the "forward" conjecture, well I can think of something some might find objectionable. If it does not row-reduce A to I, it the RRE form has a row of zeros. That means that the determinant is 0 and hence it is not invertible. I'm sure there's a better way to do this.
 

Similar threads

Codomain and Range of Linear Transformation
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Python Partial pivoting in getting the reduced row echelon form of a matrix
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Prove that a matrix can be reduced to RRE and CRE
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Determining Uniqueness of Reduced Echelon Form
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Prove B is invertible if AB = I
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Determining value of r that makes the matrix linearly dependent
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
What does a row matrix represent geometrically?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
System of equations and solving for an unknown
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
How to find a system of equations when the solution is given?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Prove there does not exist invertible matrix C satisfying A = CB
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K