Matrix Multiplication and Inverses

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that matrix A and the inverse of (I + A) commute, where I represents the identity matrix. The key equations referenced include Inverse(Inverse(A)) = A and Inverse(AB) = Inverse(B) * Inverse(A). The solution approach assumes the existence of A's inverse, but it is clarified that the proof does not require A's inverse to exist, as the existence of (I + A) inverse suffices to demonstrate the commutation property.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically matrix multiplication and inverses.
  • Familiarity with the properties of the identity matrix.
  • Knowledge of the conditions under which a matrix inverse exists.
  • Basic proficiency in linear algebra concepts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix inverses in detail, focusing on conditions for existence.
  • Learn about the implications of the identity matrix in matrix algebra.
  • Explore the concept of commutativity in matrix multiplication.
  • Investigate examples of matrices where inverses do not exist, such as singular matrices.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone involved in theoretical aspects of matrix operations and properties.

Random Variable
Messages
114
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that A and Inverse(I+A) commute (where I is the identity matrix).


Homework Equations



Inverse(Inverse(A))=A

Inverse(AB)=Inverse(B)*Inverse(A)


The Attempt at a Solution



My solution assumes the existence of the inverse of A.

A*Inverse(I+A) = Inverse(Inverse(A))*Inverse(I+A)
= Inverse[(I+A)*Inverse(A)]
= Inverse[Inverse(A)+I]
= Inverse[Inverse(A)*(I+A)]
= Inverse(I+A)*Inverse(Inverse(A))
= Inverse(I+A)*A

My professor told me that the inverse of A may or may not exist. Does he want me to prove that it does exist? Can you even prove it does exist from the fact that the inverse of (I+A) exists? Does he want a different proof? Is he just giving me a hard time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't prove A^(-1) exists. It might not. Suppose A=0. The result is still true. If (I+A)^(-1) exists then you must have (I+A)*(I+A)^(-1)=(I+A)^(-1)*(I+A)=I. Isn't that enough to prove it without assuming A^(-1) exists?
 
Yes, that's all you need. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K